some of the content has been abbreviated and paraphrased in the interest of clarity and anonymity of the parties
n28e 102' to a point on an extension of the centerline of hallway within 'this' school and 'that' community center, and running thence with and binding on said centerline
s61e 61' to a point on column line 'a-w' w/in said bldg. and running with said column line
s61e 135' to a point on the east f/o bldg
s15e 42' to a point on a line to be the west side of a future tennis court, and running thence and binding on said west line of a future tennis court
s15w 127' to a point on a chain link fence, and running thence and binding on said chain link fence
i have never seen calls to features not yet built, or calls to column lines and corridors of a building, much less the edge of a tennis court
looks to me that the school conveyed some of its building and some of its grounds for the new community center
I've seen that in preliminary CON-Dough plans.
CON-Dough (noun) A couple lawyers got together one day and decided they needed to come up with a Con to make some Dough, There you have it CONDO.
> CON-Dough (noun) A couple lawyers got together one day and decided they needed to come up with a Con to make some Dough, There you have it CONDO.
But not too much money: CON-dough-minimum 😀
I read a similar " cross-access easement" once, although the buildings existed.
A twenty something story building and a slightly shorter building eventually "swallowed" a vacated alley that originally separated them with remodeling. A large foyer was constructed with one street level entrance to allow pedestrian traffic to enter either structure. The calls in the easement included footages but also called out column numbers on one of the buildings.
I agree it was probably the legal boyz trying desperately to justify the oxygen they suck out of our environment. Someone was stupid enough to supply them with some arky-text-ural drawings and they ran with it.
