Notifications
Clear all
Strictly Surveying
1
Posts
1
Users
0
Reactions
242
Views
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
It has been ruled in many courts that GLO is not subject to collateral attack. Some have taken it erroneously to try to imply that the distances and bearings that GLO wrote on their maps is not challengeable.
What is your opinion of what not being subject to collateral attack mean? Does it mean that their judgment cannot be attacked unless fraudulent? I would be very interested to see what the consensus on this is.
Posted : September 18, 2013 6:49 am