Notifications
Clear all
Strictly Surveying
2
Posts
2
Users
0
Reactions
482
Views
Topic starter
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
TASHAKORI v. LAKIS
196 Cal.App.4th 1003 (2011)
California specific...
http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20CACO%2020110621035.xml
some interesting references here.
"The Tashakoris reasonably relied on inaccurate representations by the real estate broker and the prior owner, and the legal description contained in the preliminary title report, believing that Lot 18 had dedicated recorded easement access when they purchased their property."
Posted : March 13, 2013 8:43 am
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
You can get the LexisNexis version, courtesy of the California Courts, here:
http://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/CACourts/
Posted : March 13, 2013 7:30 pm