Notifications
Clear all

Color Codes for Collateral Evidence

9 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
(@j-penry)
Posts: 1396
Registered
Topic starter
 

Does anyone know if this color coding system for reference monuments appeared in a government document sometime prior to 1978?

NORTHEAST - METALLIC SILVER
SOUTHEAST - FLUORSCENT PINK
SOUTHWEST - FLUORSCENT BLUE
NORTHWEST - FLUORSCENT ORANGE

Berntsen said they adopted the government instructions when they came out with the DEEP-1 design in 1978-79. I didn't see it in the 1973 Manual, so it might have been internal instructions? Nebraska adopted this system in 1986 and I am giving a talk about the history behind the instructions.

 
Posted : May 19, 2017 12:15 pm
(@rj-schneider)
Posts: 2784
Registered
 

I have no idea. The best I could do was stare at the thread and hit the like button.
They conform to U.S. government instructions.
Saying U.S. government covers a lot of ground, doesn't it ?

 
Posted : May 21, 2017 7:58 am
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25292
 

Learn something new every day around this place.

 
Posted : May 21, 2017 8:03 am
(@j-penry)
Posts: 1396
Registered
Topic starter
 

I have heard from a retired BLM employee that the BLM Washington Office had issued an Instruction Mememorandum around 1979 providing policy on using colored DEEP-1's as collateral monumentation. Does anyone have a connection with the Washington Office to possibly get me a copy of this memorandum?

 
Posted : May 23, 2017 5:10 am
(@allen-wrench)
Posts: 307
Registered
 

As a surveyor for a federal agency, I've never heard of this and have seen no documentation for it. Granted, I'm sort of new here but none of the old-timers had heard of such a thing either. I have cases and cases of these magnets and they're all orange.

Plus, the scheme doesn't make sense - NE, SE of what? Isn't one guy's SE another guy's NW?

 
Posted : May 23, 2017 12:24 pm
(@eapls2708)
Posts: 1862
Registered
 

When I worked for the BLM in Alaska in the mid 80s, that was how we used them. I don't recall ever seeing anything in writing. We nearly always put a white one under a post we set, but only occasionally, when there was a lack of existing physical objects that were suitable for use as bearing objects that we would set a DEEP.

To Answer Allen Wrench's question, the direction is from the monument being witnessed, same as a call for a bearing tree or any other bearing object.

I've never seen anyone use them outside of Alaska, so I wouldn't be surprised if the pattern/policy came out of the Anchorage office.

 
Posted : May 23, 2017 12:51 pm
(@northernsurveyor)
Posts: 597
Registered
 

I can get it for you. I believe it was initiated as State Office policy first. In Alaska we were directed to use the DEEP-1s around 1986 when bearing trees were not available within Manual limits. Keep in mind BLM policy is only valid for 2 years unless policy is extended.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 
Posted : May 23, 2017 8:25 pm
(@allen-wrench)
Posts: 307
Registered
 

eapls2708, post: 429642, member: 589 wrote: To Answer Allen Wrench's question, the direction is from the monument being witnessed, same as a call for a bearing tree or any other bearing object.

I think I get it now - the magnet wasn't buried right next to the monument. So if you found an orange magnet, it would mean the actual corner monument was SE of the magnet?

 
Posted : May 24, 2017 4:18 am
(@j-penry)
Posts: 1396
Registered
Topic starter
 

NorthernSurveyor, post: 429706, member: 149 wrote: I can get it for you. I believe it was initiated as State Office policy first. In Alaska we were directed to use the DEEP-1s around 1986 when bearing trees were not available within Manual limits. Keep in mind BLM policy is only valid for 2 years unless policy is extended.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Thanks. Please send to my work email. jpenry at lancaster.ne.gov

 
Posted : May 24, 2017 4:54 am