AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

ALTA #20 Table A items

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
398 Views
mattsib79
(@mattsib79)
Posts: 376
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

20. _____ (a) Locate improvements within any offsite easements or servitudes benefitting the surveyed property that are disclosed in the Record Documents provided to the surveyor and that are observed in the process of conducting the survey (client to obtain necessary permissions).

My question is where do you stop locating the improvements within the offsite easement that benefits the subject property?

If you have a sanitary easement that benefits your property where do you stop the location?

We are working on a couple of small out parcel site in front of a Walmart. The title commitment lists easements that run all over the Walmart property and a couple of them do benefit our property. Are we supposed to show the whole easement and all structures/improvements on the whole easement across the Walmart lot?

Please can someone shed some light on this.

Thank you


 
Posted : February 8, 2013 3:12 pm
jered-mcgrath-pls
(@jered-mcgrath-pls)
Posts: 1369
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> 20. _____ (a) Locate improvements within any offsite easements or servitudes

>Are we supposed to show the whole easement and all structures/improvements on the whole easement across the Walmart lot?

Yes, I let clients know up front that this one will cost additional time and efforts.


 
Posted : February 8, 2013 3:36 pm
david-livingstone
(@david-livingstone)
Posts: 1136
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Just my opinion here, but I always thought this was listed for things like cross access agreements and easements for entrances and such. That way they can see how you get into and out of the property and see that its not blocked or anything. The problem is the ALTA standards are worded in such a way that it would include any easements. Of course on some properties, this could get really complex, and you might end up surveying most of the parent tract in following the ALTA standards.


 
Posted : February 8, 2013 4:29 pm
DrJeckyl
(@drjeckyl)
Posts: 71
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

First of all this is a negotiated item in which you need to get in writing, which easements your client wants you to located improvements and for and how far they want you to go. Then you charge accordingly.


 
Posted : February 8, 2013 4:46 pm
Rob Bachara
(@rob-bachara)
Posts: 104
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Exactly. When the 2011 Standards first came out, I attended a seminar given by Dick Bales (who helped draft the standards) regarding the changes from 2005 to 2011. The discussion about #20 was particularly interesting. In the course of the discussion, someone brought up the example of surveying an outlot in a large mall, where the access road(s) and parking lots could be easements that would affect the outlot. The question was "would I have to get the improvements in the access roads and pertinent parking lots?". The short answer was yes.


 
Posted : February 9, 2013 10:42 am