AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Adobe Acrobat

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
737 Views
Steve Corley
(@steve-corley)
Posts: 790
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I have Adobe Acrobat Pro on my computer at work. The post on the DOT Manual brought this to mind. If you have a PDF file that was printed to a PDF rather than scanned, you can save it as a word document, and get a very accurate document. This could save a lot of time with a project like the DOT manual.

I am working on building a control database. The are a lot of descriptions of monuments that were typed up back in the 60's and filed in ring binders. We have scanned some of them. I was cleaning up some monuments in the database and decided to give the PDF save as a try. On the first monument, I re typed the description. It was no fun. Then I did a save as with the PDF file and created a word document. Then I called up the next monument in the database and pasted the description in. Even though the scan was crooked, it did a very good job of converting it to text. I checked all the numbers and directions, took about 30 seconds to fix them, them looked at the entire description. They've were a few extra spaces such as " h Ouse" but. I attached a copy of the PDF to the database as an associated document. The next ones that I did, I included a note that the description was from a scan and to check the associated documents for the original PDF. Now all I have to do is add descriptions to the other 75,000 monuments that do not have them included. Until then, a hand held GPS and metal detector is a good way to recover them, if you don't have the paper description.


 
Posted : November 17, 2013 8:42 am
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8310
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Acrobat's OCR is quite good. If you "take a snapshot" of the specific text you want to OCR, and run an optimization to deskew it before you OCR, it will work even better.

I consider Acrobat an indispensable part of my toolkit.


 
Posted : November 17, 2013 8:26 pm
Ralph Perez
(@ralph-perez)
Posts: 1262
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> I consider Acrobat an indispensable part of my toolkit.

:good: :good:


 
Posted : November 17, 2013 10:13 pm
norm-larson
(@norm-larson)
Posts: 985
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I agree, Acrobat's ability to take raster and vector information into one document alone makes it worth having, but, then add in OCR and then 3D embed ...


 
Posted : November 19, 2013 11:00 am