Trimble Business Center — Have confidence in your data. Start free trial.

AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Ring, Ring

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
693 Views
MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10689
Member P&R, Founder
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

An engineer was doing a topo and design for a road/pad.

I have been helping him out with his Trimble files and OPUS submissions, he has also been using RTX-PP which so far has been giving out better results than OPUS, at least for elevations, I just don't have any clue how, which is a bit concerning.

Usually he is in remote areas, has to be an average of 80-100 miles to the nearest CORS.

So he calls in a big panic, says he is at a site and checked into a CORS and it was really off..............

Scratching my head; "you CHECKED-INTO a CORS?"

First I'm wondering where he his, there are some stand-alone Cors stations in the area out by themselves in the middle of open fields, maybe he is near one of them. But, how exactly do you check into one of them?

So I ask the name of the station and he gives it to me, doesn't sound familiar, I look it up and it's a Triangulation Station-1st order and all, he's about .6' from the published new NAD83 number.

Pretty expected, I had the darndest time explaining that everything is just fine, that it is expected to be "off" somewhat, that the "official" number is a rough conversion, that it's not a CORS, that a HARN point would check better,,

He just couldn't get why they would publish something to thousands of a foot if it's only accurate to the nearest foot......
Tried to explain why, not sure it made any sense to him.....


 
Posted : March 11, 2016 8:28 am
lee-d
(@lee-d)
Posts: 2382
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

MightyMoe, post: 361797, member: 700 wrote: he has also been using RTX-PP which so far has been giving out better results than OPUS, at least for elevations

How long is he occupying the points?


 
Posted : March 11, 2016 9:12 am
MightyMoe
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 10689
Member P&R, Founder
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Lee D, post: 361805, member: 7971 wrote: How long is he occupying the points?

He sits on his base point through-out the work day, from 6-10 hours usually when he is working in the field. They have R8's.

The tie to the Tri station was just an RTK shot, I didn't even look at his numbers, I'm pretty much disinterested in them any more unless they are a bench mark or a HARN.

There are no networks, CORS are far off, they have put one "nearby" probably, 75 miles from his location


 
Posted : March 11, 2016 9:20 am
lee-d
(@lee-d)
Posts: 2382
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Got it. A lot different than what I'm used to down here.


 
Posted : March 11, 2016 10:56 am