AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

State boundary disputes

33 Posts
20 Users
0 Reactions
1,470 Views
bill93
(@bill93)
Posts: 9977
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Iowa and Nebraska had some arguments in maybe the 1980's over land where the Missouri River changed course. The dispute goes back further than that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Lake,_Iowa


 
Posted : September 25, 2011 12:49 pm
holy-cow
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25672
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Colorado vs. Oklahoma and New Mexico

As mentioned above, the south line of Colorado was disputed. Also the true northwest corner of Oklahoma was moved again based on poor locating of the true longitude.

The bootheel section of Missouri is another entertaining story.


 
Posted : September 25, 2011 1:58 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 11990
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The description of Nevada overlaps into California but California is senior 🙂


 
Posted : September 25, 2011 2:24 pm
Dave Ingram
(@dave-ingram)
Posts: 2140
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

THANK YOU

to all who have posted so far. And I look forward to additional responses.


 
Posted : September 25, 2011 4:20 pm
paden-cash
(@paden-cash)
Posts: 11086
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

And if you can't sleep...

Oklahoma and Texas have been scrapping for years:

Original Boundary Controversy

1922 Ruling

1982 Ruling

et cetera...ad nausium

I think the States are still scrapping, these are just three cases.


 
Posted : September 25, 2011 7:52 pm

DeralOfLawton
(@deral-of-lawton)
Posts: 1711
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I don't have any links but the 100th between Okie and Texas went to the Supreme court.


 
Posted : September 26, 2011 2:25 am
aliquot
(@aliquot)
Posts: 2323
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Texas and New Mexico had a boundary issue along the Rio Grande that was ended by the supreme court in 1927. It was called the Country Club dispute. Monuments similar to the Texas-Oklahoma photo were set at all the angle points. Some are in back yards and in the middle of roads and parking lots today.


 
Posted : September 26, 2011 7:07 am
ddsm
 ddsm
(@ddsm)
Posts: 2222
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Arkansas v. (the Mississippi River)

U.S. Supreme Court

Arkansas v. Tennessee 1918 (Thalweg rule)
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7000302311551396064&q=arkansas+v.+mississippi&hl=en&as_sdt=2,4

Arkansas v. Mississippi 1919 (Acknowledges an avulsion around 1848)
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6117771079695955754&q=arkansas+v.+mississippi&hl=en&as_sdt=2,4

Arkansas v. Mississippi 1920 (Call for Survey)
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5786499472811697560&q=arkansas+v.+mississippi&hl=en&as_sdt=2,4

Arkansas v. Mississippi 1921 (Survey of Friars Point area)
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7111833681564882783&q=arkansas+v.+mississippi&hl=en&as_sdt=2,4

Arkansas v. Tennessee 1940
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15658142689002099608&q=arkansas+v.+mississippi&hl=en&as_sdt=2,4

Mississippi v. Arkansas 1974 (Lake Chicot area)
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14461634544749959105&q=arkansas+v.+mississippi&hl=en&as_sdt=2,4

Arkansas v. Mississippi 1985 (Final Decree – Cites Plats)
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12332625689144298056&q=arkansas+v.+mississippi&hl=en&as_sdt=2,4# [1]

Question 1? Was the Easterly border of Arkansas fixed at Statehood?
Question 2? Is the Easterly border of Arkansas Riparian?

Have fun,
DDSM

:beer:


 
Posted : September 26, 2011 9:36 am
duane-frymire
(@duane-frymire)
Posts: 1923
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

NY v NJ Ellis Island dispute makes for interesting discussion. No links offhand. Decided +- late 1990's?


 
Posted : September 26, 2011 11:23 am
Dan-Dunn
(@dan-dunn)
Posts: 366
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

New Jersey v. Delaware:

295 U.S. 694 (1935)
NEW JERSEY v. DELAWARE (No. 134, Orig.)

New Jersey v. New York:

New York – New Jersey Line War
NEW JERSEY v. NEW YORK 523 U.S. 767 page 779 (Ellis Island)


 
Posted : September 26, 2011 2:07 pm

eapls2708
(@eapls2708)
Posts: 1907
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

What About a Gap, Dave?

[StirPot]
If there's a gap, do we have to identify it as a new State or federal territory that didn't previously exist? You know that there are at least a couple surveyors around who would vigorously argue that there is a previously unrecognized parcel there still owned by the original grantor.

Would the feds still own it or can a sovereign adverse possess against another sovereign without going to war?
[/stir]


 
Posted : September 27, 2011 2:11 pm
eapls2708
(@eapls2708)
Posts: 1907
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

CA v AZ, 440 US 59 (1979)

CA v AZ, 452 US 431 (1981)

CA v NV, 447 US 125 (1980)

CA v NV, 456 US 867 (1982)


 
Posted : September 27, 2011 2:23 pm
dave-karoly
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 11990
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Evan

would you please quit trying to determine intent!


 
Posted : September 27, 2011 7:20 pm
Page 2 / 2