Now, there's up a creek without a paddle ...........

I keep getting redirected somewhere else.

Do a F5 when you get the wrong stuff.. That should clear out the garbage.

So...

The Police cite Coleman for disorderly conduct.

Coleman says "I didn't do it!"

The DA drops the case for some reason.

Coleman says, "Malicious Prosecution!"

Coleman and the defendant County both move for Summary Judgment. The Judge grants County's summary judgment (Coleman-you lose).

For some reason on appeal Coleman only Appeals the Trial Court's refusal to grant his Summary Judgment. The Appeals Court says the first element required to establish Malicious Prosecution (lack of probable cause) is not a slam dunk therefore you need a Jury to decide it. Therefore the Judge was right to deny Summary Judgment.

Here's the kicker...
Since the other Summary Judgment motion granted to the County was not raised on Appeal we leave it in place!

Check on Jimmy

I think this is around Jimmy Cleveland's area. Jimmy, whats the scoop?