AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Colorado Legislature - HB13-1012 - Utility Co Eminent Domain

7 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
282 Views
DeletedUser
(@deleted-user)
Posts: 8340
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The Colorado legislature has introduced a bill that would grant the power of Eminent Domain to domestic and foreign utility companies

here is the link
Colorado HB 13-1012


 
Posted : January 15, 2013 2:31 pm
Dave Ingram
(@dave-ingram)
Posts: 2140
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Do I smell gas & oil?


 
Posted : January 15, 2013 2:46 pm
vern
 vern
(@vern)
Posts: 1514
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

That one is all about wildfire mitigation. are you referring to hb13-1013
"CONCERNING LIMITATIONS ON A LANDOWNER'S ABILITY TO IMPOSE
CONDITIONS ON A WATER RIGHT OWNER AS A CONDITION OF
PERMISSION TO USE LAND." ?


 
Posted : January 15, 2013 3:14 pm
DeletedUser
(@deleted-user)
Posts: 8340
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> That one is all about wildfire mitigation. are you referring to hb13-1013
> "CONCERNING LIMITATIONS ON A LANDOWNER'S ABILITY TO IMPOSE
> CONDITIONS ON A WATER RIGHT OWNER AS A CONDITION OF
> PERMISSION TO USE LAND." ?

Maybe this link will work
SENATE BILL 13-021 Link


 
Posted : January 15, 2013 3:32 pm
holy-cow
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25672
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The link worked just fine

It is a little scary, though, giving eminent domain rights to private enterprise. I'll stop at that. Don't want to get into all the political plusses and minuses involved.


 
Posted : January 15, 2013 6:56 pm

sonofa
(@sonofa)
Posts: 79
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The link worked just fine

Take a weekend drive North and East of the two major highways along the front range and you will see little pink stakes along grid lines and tracks from the seismic trucks following close behind. Lots of planning money on the ground for the past couple of years at least.


 
Posted : January 15, 2013 8:25 pm
ridge
(@ridge)
Posts: 2701
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

From the summary it looks like they are trying to reverse by statute an upper court opinion from May 2012.


 
Posted : January 15, 2013 10:39 pm