AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
Paul Plutae
Paul Plutae
@paul-plutae
Member
Joined: July 1, 2010 1:39 pm
Topics: 171 / Replies: 1090
Reply
RE: The monument is the corner

>That was a question that Paul didn't provide enough information to answer. I have done my best to do so. It may dribble in at times, but I am not ...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Lot line probably controls> Well, you have the 1982 surveyor's map of Tract No. 40968 that shows he recovered a 1 in. iron pipe where the 1924 surv...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

forgot to ask> What does "Fd." mean?> "found" ? Sure does..

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Eric> 0.34' ???> No one I've worked for wouldn't hold that and go on. The lath author called the 2" pipe South by 0.34'. My survey, using subdi...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Not enough information, it would appear.> Okay, so the land in the vicinity of the NE common corner of Lots 4 and 5 of Tract No. 40968 (the 1982 su...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Thanks for the offer Kent> Oh, Christ, you're going to make me do your work for you? I appreciate the offer and the prayer Kent, but The Lord and I...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

>That "other evidence" may include record dimensions. I bet you find a lot of monuments off by a few hundreths Jim

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Kent> Hey, I'm just looking at the map you posted, Paul, which was this:> > > > Now, I realize you're in California, but as I read that...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

> Hey, I'm just looking at the map that YOU posted and the notes that ITS surveyor put on it. It's pretty easy to follow the guys map. Here's a few...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

>but it looks as if the 2 in. iron pipe that was set in 1982 wasn't an original monument defining the West line of the tract subdivided. Stay in T...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Kent> So, the situation is... Here we go. You're starting into making stuff up again. The situation IS as I posted.>that the 2 in. pipe was sup...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Teddy Bear> i beg to differ if i didn't i wouldn't be TDD-- I am at a loss here. What are you differing on?

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Kent> ....Is the status of the 2" pipe set in 1982 that it was an attempt to locate one of those lot corners that hadn't originally been monumented...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

6th PM> - MY OPINION IS THAT THE GUYS THAT DO THIS TYPE OF THING ARE JACKWAGONS - THEY THINK THEY ARE BETTER SURVEYORS THAN THE ONES BEFORE THEM, A...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Kent> Judging by the aerial photo, it looks as if that's a hillside. Is there any reason to think that the sloping areas have shifted since 1982? T...

16 years ago
Topic
Replies: 63
Views: 1923
Reply
RE: Property Line Plaque

> Paul; it is more than a sign, it is a claim. I disagree. It's a statement, not a claim. Jud let's just agree to disagree on this one. The last t...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: Major Problem ~ Please Help

NEVER MINDCHEERS!!!!!!:good:

16 years ago
Reply
RE: Major Problem ~ Please Help

I sure hope this works out for you Brad..I really do. I have had a few scares when my DC suddenly says that all memory is lost, but so far I have not ...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: Property Line Plaque

Those type of plaques are common in downtown Los Angeles. The reason they are there is because the sidewalk is built up to the building which is setba...

16 years ago
Page 54 / 64