AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
Paul Plutae
Paul Plutae
@paul-plutae
Member
Joined: July 1, 2010 1:39 pm
Topics: 171 / Replies: 1090
Reply
RE: 2" Iron pipe is 0.34' South update - Kent

> The fact that the 2 in. iron pipe that the 1982 engineer/surveyor reported as lying on the 1924 line was actually about 0.5 ft. S of it should ri...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: 2" Iron pipe is 0.34' South update - Kent

Kent - Hahaha...you are funny guy lol> Well, from what you've posted it looks as if you have a reasonable basis for concluding that the 2 in. iron...

16 years ago
Topic
16 years ago
Replies: 7
Views: 831
Topic
Replies: 13
Views: 807
Reply
RE: So, If Monuments Mean Nothing

Parcel Map Trivia - JimLA County / City will not allow those types of PM's. Max of 5 parcels.

16 years ago
Reply
RE: So, If Monuments Mean Nothing

Notice of difference of opinion> Well, when one surveyor says "this is the corner" and another surveyor says "no, this isn't the corner", that is w...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: So, If Monuments Mean Nothing

Another Surveyor ->....and another surveyor says "no, this isn't the corner"... When I made the OP, the first thing I said after the heading was..T...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: So, If Monuments Mean Nothing

Notice of difference of opinion>Well, the surveyor's lath clearly expressed a significant difference of opinion as to the location of the common bo...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: So, If Monuments Mean Nothing

Beyond inquiry notice!>The lath provides what is known as inquiry notice Totally disagree, The lath represents ignorance.

16 years ago
Reply
RE: So, If Monuments Mean Nothing

Kent> Well, when what is disputed is the boundary of the subdivision, as was true in the case that prompted your thread, No Kent. The thread was pr...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: So, If Monuments Mean Nothing

Mr Cow>Look below to see Paul and Kent still debating the issue from yesterday. Not exactly the same thing, but, close. It really was not a debate...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: The monument is the corner

McMillimeter6th..with a grain of salt my friend, just a grain of salt 😉

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

KentThe conversation with you suddenly became very boring. Have a good rest of the day

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Kent> I'm a bit surprised to hear a surveyor wondering whether the boundaries of a subdivision are proven entirely from the plat of record. No, no...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Lot line probably controls _ Kent> .... If the 2 in. iron pipe that the 1982 surveyor set for the NW common corner of Lots 4 and 5 is found to be o...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Kent> .... I can understand why you guys feel as if you have to take short cuts out there. Uncalled for Kent..>Time is, after all, money. But i...

16 years ago
Reply
RE: The monument is the corner

MerlinThis is the reference thread.. and I might add, it's not 'drivel'. Dr Watson deals in drivel;-)

16 years ago
Reply
RE: "Fd. 2" IP 0.34' south of True Corner"

Lot line probably controls _ Kent> In other words, the map of the 1982 survey may not actually be the best evidence of the location of the boundari...

16 years ago
Page 53 / 64