AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
loyal
loyal
@loyal
Free
Joined: July 2, 2010 11:11 pm
Last seen: June 28, 2026 8:47 pm
Topics: 212 / Replies: 3523
Reply
RE: Not the ideal survey chariot

I dunno Holy, this is more like what I imagine you driving...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Not the ideal survey chariot

Holy Cow, post: 369391, member: 50 wrote: Ford F-550 Flatbed Truck, Engine: Ford 6.7 liter V8 turbo diesel, 300 HP, Fuel Type: Diesel, Autoshift Trans...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Castle Nut/Survey Stone

Holy Cow, post: 369387, member: 50 wrote: This is known as a castle nut. Today, we went searching for a stone at a center corner. What I first saw...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Lost section corner on sectional correction line

MightyMoe, post: 369337, member: 700 wrote: Generally I have seen them in independent resurveys, they are run through the township, sometimes all six ...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Lost section corner on sectional correction line

MightyMoe, post: 369331, member: 700 wrote: That would be poorly worded, I'd imagine that they were asking how do you reestablished a lost section cor...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: 1-point vertical calibration accuracy

Jim in AZ, post: 369327, member: 249 wrote: "even Stability A Bench Marks 'can' move" Everything is moving! Between tectonic movement, subsidence, pos...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: 1-point vertical calibration accuracy

As several have stated above, the [actual] gravitational anomalies that we are [really] talking about, are subtle [almost] to the extreme. While we "p...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: 1-point vertical calibration accuracy

As a follow up on Mighty's posts above, Here's a larger version from a recent project. Oh yeah... and the "inclined Plane is inclined the WRONG dir...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Distance between two NGS marks in SurvCE

rfc, You stated above: "When I do an inverse on the collector between the two, The AZ is OK (355-27-02), which is 01-03.2 off (Convergence from the da...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Distance between two NGS marks in SurvCE

rfc, post: 369072, member: 8882 wrote: No gun in play yet.I took the Mark to Mark Distance from the Inverse3D sheet: 842.8015 meters. I put the SP coo...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: SURVEY PARTY

Holy Cow, post: 369079, member: 50 wrote: On Larry Phipp's left, our right, is Don Bormann and Dick Elgin from Missouri. Continuing to the Right...H...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: 1-point vertical calibration accuracy

Lee D, post: 369008, member: 7971 wrote: Actually no I didn't you shouldn't authoritatively state a false assumption. I keyed in the lat/long/ellipsoi...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: 1-point vertical calibration accuracy

Lee D, post: 368881, member: 7971 wrote: Not sure how you got the scale factor you wrote on there from TBC... here's what TBC reported for the scale v...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: TBC - Date & Time Way Off

Yeah... the constellation was a little weak at that point! Seriously though, try converting to RINEX and take a look at the data (or post the "header"...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Lost section corner on sectional correction line

My two bits... Treat it the same as a Township or Standard Parallel "Line" (single proportion on the arc). BUT don't reject ANYTHING along that "line"...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: NAD 27 and NAD 83 or somewhere in between....

Beats me Daniel... I have been helping another Surveyor deal with one of those "kinda-sorta" (BUT NOT) NAD27 things, that has the added enjoyment of a...

10 years ago
Topic
Replies: 6
Views: 1052
Reply
RE: SURVEY PARTY

RADAR, post: 368777, member: 413 wrote: I was going through some old pictures and found this blast from the past: See anyone you know? Yup... I'm...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: 1-point vertical calibration accuracy

Bill93, post: 368770, member: 87 wrote: Seems to me (not a user of any of the software discussed) that either the manufacturers are not providing enou...

10 years ago
Page 100 / 187