Notifications
Clear all
Kent McMillan
@kent-mcmillan
Joined: Jun 30, 2010
Topics: 589 / Replies: 10830
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Dave Karoly, post: 445457, member: 94 wrote: In real life it'll be simple, 15 minutes with your GPR 30 minutes of digging to the stone, pretty boring....

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Dave Karoly, post: 445451, member: 94 wrote: I'm thinking after you and Ellis uncover the stones the movie will star Jackie Chan as you and Chris Tuck...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Gene Kooper, post: 445450, member: 9850 wrote: Well, Kent when you have no field experience in using a "black box" others will assume that you have so...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Gene Kooper, post: 445447, member: 9850 wrote: And there is one poster without any professional training as a geophysicist, espousing the utility in f...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Dave Karoly, post: 445444, member: 94 wrote: You were too chicken to take Leon's challenge and you are too chicken to take on this challenge. It's eas...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Ohio Surveyor, post: 445439, member: 12195 wrote: Speaking of stones, here's a photo of one. That's pretty good. It confirms this report from 1882 th...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Dave Karoly, post: 445433, member: 94 wrote: just have to take a quick trip over there. It's a beautiful part of the country, worth a quick visit. Fi...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

paden cash, post: 445425, member: 20 wrote: Hey, leave us outa this...Well, what sort of fee should one expect for NOT going to Oklahoma to find stone...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Dave Karoly, post: 445423, member: 94 wrote: Oklahoma and Kansas have nothing to do with this. I don't know why you're bringing them up.Okay, I'll mar...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Gene Kooper, post: 445419, member: 9850 wrote: Sorry, Kent. At 63 posts and counting for this thread, you just aren't that interesting for me to read...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Dave Karoly, post: 445416, member: 94 wrote: Come on Kent, be a man, back up your words with action! Oklahoma has nothing to do with this. You have wh...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Peter Hughes-Davies, post: 445397, member: 48 wrote: Bing.com/maps covers Harmonyville Rd. and some of School Rd. with Streetside images quite well.T...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Dave Karoly, post: 445410, member: 94 wrote: Got your airline ticket yet or are you going to drive?Actually, Oklahoma is much closer than Pennsylvania...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

I take it back. I found that 1883 map and see that what I thought said "LANE" actually reads "Sch Ho" This is generally consistent with the 1883 map ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Ohio Surveyor, post: 445403, member: 12195 wrote: Found on the web: 1883 Atlas of Harmonyville. This map doesn't make any distinction between the ro...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Peter Ehlert, post: 445378, member: 60 wrote: I actually tried street view, but could find none in Google Maps or Google Earth... I thought it would b...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Gene Kooper, post: 445334, member: 9850 wrote: Since you are so inspired about using GPR to find buried stones, you should go for it Kent. The compan...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Alvin Tostick, post: 445324, member: 13000 wrote: Reasons for not searching for the original stones in roads presented in this post. Experience has s...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Hatfield and Mccoy nonsense..

Peter Ehlert, post: 445314, member: 60 wrote: Lately he has been guilty of making grand assumptions, then building upon them as if they are given Fact...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Star*Net 9.

SellmanA, post: 445307, member: 8564 wrote: Yes, that's the one. I use the graphic plot all the time for showing error ellipses and so forth, but it w...

7 years ago
Page 2 / 571