AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
eapls2708
eapls2708
@eapls2708
Free
Joined: September 1, 2010 8:58 am
Last seen: September 15, 2026 3:06 pm
Topics: 32 / Replies: 1875
Reply
RE: Oops...

ADD is the reason most of my posts are so long. I have a point to make, start heading in that direction and then another point comes to mind, go in t...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Deed vs Occupation

You've given us a pretty good outline of the recent survey history, but what about the more distant survey history and the deed history? The "block co...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: I'm confused

Good, that's one set of points that you don't have to wonder if they are the original locations (unless either has been disturbed). How does your meas...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: I'm confused

In the absence of survey monuments, you need to look at roadway improvements and the history of their placement and upgrades since initial placement. ...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: I'm confused

in re: E 100 vs E 1/2 Given the facts I presented, are you sure about that? Because of the inherent difficulty in precisely reproducing another's prev...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: I'm confused

Many years ago, I worked for a company that had its main office in Tacoma and I worked out of a satellite office in Bremerton. The LS I worked for wa...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: I'm confused

I agree with the other guys. You hold the monuments you found, but rather than forcing a closure to the calculated angle point on Weaver, you need to...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: I'm confused

You say that the "original" monuments you found were "originally stone monuments". Are they still the stone monuments or has someone replaced them wi...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: I'm confused

Rich., post: 348072, member: 10450 wrote: I don't think anywhere says you need to accept found pins with caps unless they were set by the original sur...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Pin Finders

My experience has been that the 52 (square top) is slightly more consistent and slightly better at pulling in a signal, and a lot more rugged. The 72...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Deed Interpretation

"... place ourselves as near as possible in the seats which were occupied by the parties at the time the instrument was written,..." That looks to me ...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Need some opinions

When I worked for a gas pipeline company, they made all of their measurements along the slope of the ground. That was useful for pipe quantities but ...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Why is it for the courts to decide?

I haven't read a single post in this thread that suggested, even remotely that one should reject a deed. The only time a deed should be rejected is w...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Why is it for the courts to decide?

Seems like you went through the full analysis. As to SIT and his point, I don't believe I disrespected his point, and don't recall that anyone else di...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: We are not really surveyors any more.

I don't think that when surveyors here use a term like "magic box" that they are implying that they have no idea what it's doing or why it supplies th...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Why is it for the courts to decide?

I think that in reducing the question to hold the fences vs hold the measurements & math simplifies the matter way too much and skips some crucial...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: We are not really surveyors any more.

Good observations Nate. But I don't necessarily think that it is the methods of measurement that determines whether or not we are surveyors. If we c...

11 years ago
Reply
RE: Railroad ROW issues...

I would survey according to the deeds and evidence that you have or could obtain by a reasonably diligent research effort (which you've no doubt alrea...

11 years ago
Page 40 / 96