If you really get to 0.01 ft accuracy, over a north-south extent of several miles, then you will need to do the geoid correction, which a lot of peopl...

@jim-frame You need to read up on this: estimated tax annualized method I had a big RMD late in the year and the estimated tax computation wants t...

Happy to report that after spending way too much time listening to the IRS hold music and being grilled for all kinds of info, I got someone to promis...

Yes, I've seen several intersection stations changed since being observed by C&GS, and looked for a lot more that are gone. Of course, be sure to...

My answer duplicates some of a previous one, but I'll let it stand as I typed it. If I read it right, that's nominally 165 ft east-west and 50 ft nor...

She has some web pages about the Nantucket stones. Her longer paper (24 pgs double spaced w/ 4 pictures) is on the flash drive distributed at the...

While it is convenient to have known points on a N-S line, a pair at any azimuth can provide a useful check on your astro work,

Update: I did finally get cleared and looked at the IRS site, where I find it as I expected - credited to wrong year.

@chris-bouffard I was up to speed on the line changing as the waterway changes but I hadn't heard that little caveat that if the description calls f...

it would apparently only take about 10% extra effort ... for them to also get a PLS, Probably 10% more classes, but then there's the experience tha...

@williwaw If you try beerleg.com you will find it directs to surveyorconnect.com and I expect Wendell will forward things to the new site, at least ...