> Your residuals are all zero indicating no adjustment.
>
> If you look at the output from Kent's data (below) you will see it gives the unadjusted closure latitude and departure and the ratio. Plus it adjusts the data afterwards.
That might make sense. But here's what I don't get:
Originally, I used the BM lines for the traverse. Then, per Kent's instructions, found the coordinates that Starnet calculated. They're in my dat file, all "#'d" out.
Then I tried using the Traverse command ("T"). That output the "adjusted" coordinates. But those are all different than those originally calculated. I'm trying to figure out why that is.
For example, in the original calculation, 102 was placed at:
1054.98313 904.76593
But in the latest method, using the T statement, 102 is now at:
999.78942 1000.13363
These are way different.
I may have done something screwy (not surprising), so will probably start over and see what I did wrong.