AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Time Machine.....

22 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
554 Views
paden-cash
(@paden-cash)
Posts: 11086
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I am now working on a R/W project that involves a very long stretch of curved highway R/W. One of the R/W curves has a radius of something in the neighborhood of 25000.000 m. Attempting to create descriptions that parallel and close on this line (while working in imperial units) produces a minor amount of error. It can either be dealt with using non-tangent curve section distances (boo)...or do what the highway department would prefer...write them in metric (double boo).

Maybe we should trade projects....you know, a fresh set of eyes...I'm sick of this one too.


 
Posted : June 2, 2016 12:27 pm
larry-scott
(@larry-scott)
Posts: 1059
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I think the USC&GS has always been metric.

I didn't find a single technical chart, table, or reference to feet, or Fahrenheit. Even the graphic scale on maps have kilometers. (Except in summaries of area completed sq mi)

USC&GS Report of 1899.


 
Posted : June 2, 2016 9:57 pm
Page 2 / 2