AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

time bandit OPUS files?

9 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
437 Views
DavidALee
(@davidalee)
Posts: 1116
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I guess this could also go under humor 🙂

I came in to the office this morning, booted up my computer and opened Outlook. I received 35-40 emails from OPUS for files from 2008-2009. Are these time bandit files? Has anybody else experienced this?


 
Posted : April 5, 2012 5:22 am
paul-in-pa
(@paul-in-pa)
Posts: 6034
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Sometimes The Queue Is Long

What was the process date?

BTW, did they use the finsl otbit?

Paul in PA


 
Posted : April 5, 2012 5:40 am
DavidALee
(@davidalee)
Posts: 1116
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Sometimes The Queue Is Long

FILE: 38662670.08o 000443178

NGS OPUS SOLUTION REPORT
========================

All computed coordinate accuracies are listed as peak-to-peak values.
For additional information: http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/OPUS/about.jsp#accuracy

USER: DATE: April 05, 2012
RINEX FILE: 3866267l.08o TIME: 00:59:01 UTC

SOFTWARE: page5 1108.09 master14.pl 082511 START: 2008/09/23 11:17:00
EPHEMERIS: igs14982.eph [precise] STOP: 2008/09/23 16:51:00
NAV FILE: brdc2670.08n OBS USED: 14120 / 14756 : 96%
ANT NAME: TRM_R8_GNSS NONE # FIXED AMB: 72 / 75 : 96%
ARP HEIGHT: 2.0 OVERALL RMS: 0.014(m)

REF FRAME: NAD_83(2011)(EPOCH:2010.0000) IGS08 (EPOCH:2008.7284)

X: 735626.875(m) 0.003(m) 735626.136(m) 0.003(m)
Y: -4799104.965(m) 0.001(m) -4799103.547(m) 0.001(m)
Z: 4122719.040(m) 0.007(m) 4122718.959(m) 0.007(m)

LAT: 40 31 33.47283 0.006(m) 40 31 33.50272 0.006(m)
E LON: 278 42 52.93953 0.003(m) 278 42 52.91763 0.003(m)
W LON: 81 17 7.06047 0.003(m) 81 17 7.08237 0.003(m)
EL HGT: 257.231(m) 0.004(m) 256.027(m) 0.004(m)
ORTHO HGT: [Geoid Model Not Yet Available w/ NAD83 (2011).]

UTM COORDINATES STATE PLANE COORDINATES
UTM (Zone 17) SPC (3401 OH N)
Northing (Y) [meters] 4486175.906 96138.852
Easting (X) [meters] 475835.197 702923.132
Convergence [degrees] -0.18538319 0.79800111
Point Scale 0.99960719 0.99998354
Combined Factor 0.99956685 0.99994320

US NATIONAL GRID DESIGNATOR: 17TME7583586175(NAD 83)

BASE STATIONS USED
PID DESIGNATION LATITUDE LONGITUDE DISTANCE(m)
DF4054 LSBN LISBON CORS ARP N404608.935 W0804837.471 48402.6
AJ7188 FREO FREEPORT CORS ARP N401205.969 W0811528.221 36088.4
DI1884 OHTU TUSCARAWAS CORS ARP N402725.408 W0812428.009 12899.3

NEAREST NGS PUBLISHED CONTROL POINT
KY3427 ROSWELL N402748.803 W0812051.081 8718.7


 
Posted : April 5, 2012 5:52 am
DeralOfLawton
(@deral-of-lawton)
Posts: 1711
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

If you have the extended output then you will notice a NEW (non NAVD-88) computer orthometric height.

** Orthometric Heights Above Future Geopotential Datum.

Prototype orthometric heights are now being made available as a precursor to the completion of GRAV-D and the replacement of NAVD 88 with a new geopotential reference system. The following height reflects the current best estimate of the true orthometric height, based on the existing gravimetric geoid model. This height is subject to change as data and modeling for the gravimetric geoid change throughout the lifetime of the GRAV-D project, or as new realizations of the ITRF are adopted. However, at the completion of GRAV-D, these heights will supersede the NAVD 88 heights

APPROX ORTHO HGT: 336.538 (m) [PROTOTYPE (Computed using USGG2009,GRS80,ITRF2000)]

Looks like the ones sent to me were all OPUS-DB stations that I created but I'll have to check them later. We have to topo jobs to do this morning.

Deral


 
Posted : April 5, 2012 6:26 am
DavidALee
(@davidalee)
Posts: 1116
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> Looks like the ones sent to me were all OPUS-DB stations that I created but I'll have to check them later. We have to topo jobs to do this morning.
>
> Deral

I believe these were stations that were submitted to OPUS-DB as well.


 
Posted : April 5, 2012 6:29 am

DeralOfLawton
(@deral-of-lawton)
Posts: 1711
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I checked three quickly and they were all OPUS-DB stations. The reports sent are in the latest NAD-83(2011) and there are no geoid heights computed. But there are these new grav-d orthometric heights. I'll have to copy and take these home tonight for a bit of study.

Stop the world. I want to get off.

And I'm still trying to work my head around relative versus absolute antenna files. (Antinfo versus Antex). I have a lot of catching up to do now.

Deral


 
Posted : April 5, 2012 6:35 am
Moe Shetty
(@moe-shetty)
Posts: 1430
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

i got two opus results yesterday as well. haven't actually used it in about three weeks. maybe old data files are rattling through the pipeline


 
Posted : April 5, 2012 10:16 am
loyal
(@loyal)
Posts: 3735
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Yup...I got one this morning too (from 2008).

It is the ONLY OPUS_DB submission file that I have as yet submitted, so I think that the OPUS_DB "connection" is probably the answer.

It seems to me that I heard [somewhere] that the NGS was going to "update" the existing OPUS_DB [database] to NAD83(2011) Epoch 2010.0000 at some point, MAYBE this is the beginning (or end) of that process.

Loyal


 
Posted : April 5, 2012 10:25 am
DavidALee
(@davidalee)
Posts: 1116
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I received about 30 or so yesterday evening. We have submitted well over 200, probably close to 300 stations to DB, mostly around USACE projects.


 
Posted : April 5, 2012 11:08 am