I just wrote this. It's a draft at this time. It would typically apply to surveys for right of way improvement projects. I invite your suggestions and (preferably mild) criticism.
Planning Phase
Planning phase will heavily rely on available GIS resources including tax lot mapping, LIDAR based contours, aerial photography, and surveys of record. This data may be augmented by field survey only when the record and experience in the area indicates significant irregularities.
Design Phase Survey
Design phase survey work calls for the performance of topographic Surveying Services within the defined work area, including but not limited to:
- Survey record, title, road, and as-built research including:
- Relevant survey control data sheets and records;
- Surveys and plats of record as available on the Washington County Ispirits database;
- Current vesting deeds for affected properties;
- Other deeds as may be referenced within the vesting deeds, the tax mapping, and survey and plat records;
- Utility mapping and as-built documents from the City??s GIS together with?ÿ utility company mapping records obtained pursuant to a ??One-Call? Utility Locate Request;
- Field Survey to establish appropriate spatial and elevation control to support the boundary, topographic to be performed, and to facilitate future right of way acquisition and construction phase survey work.
- Monuments composed of ?«? diameter iron rod 24? long with plastic cap and/or Bernsten style 1? brass plugs, or better, shall be established at intervisible locations not more than 800?? apart within or adjacent to the defined project area. A minimum of three such monuments will be established for any project regardless of extent. Wood hubs, Mag Nails, and similar are not considered suitably permanent for this purpose.
- The quality and composition of other survey control monuments that may be established as needed is at the discretion of the consultant.
- Field survey to recover and locate existing property corner monuments, of record or otherwise. Consultant shall proceed in observance of and in compliance with the provisions of ORS 672.047;
- Recovery of right-of-way lines and roadway, access, and public utility easements serving the project area.
- Determination of individual property lines to a degree of precision appropriate to the project needs.
- Requesting and coordinating public utility locates per the Oregon ??One-call? system.
- Topographic Field Survey including, but not limited to:
- Planimetric features including
- Curbs, gutter lines, sidewalks, edges of travelled ways and paved surfaces;
- Fences and walls;
- Buildings and other structures, including all those within 10?? of the defined survey area;
- Signs, both public and private;
- Traffic striping including lane markings, crosswalks,
- Vegetation and landscaping including;
- Limits of planted (landscaped) areas
- Ornamental trees 6?? or greater in height, regardless of caliper
- Native trees 6-inch diameter at breast height and greater
- Topographic surfaces to a density and degree of precision sufficient to model?ÿ
- paved and other hard surfaces to +/- 0.10??;
- graded surfaces to +/- 0.2??;
- natural ground surfaces to +/- 0.5??;
- rugged/irregular surfaces to +/- 1.0??.
- Evidence visible at surface of utilities, including
- Sanitary and Storm Drain manholes tied at the point on the rim closest to the center of the manhole barrel;
- Catch basins, ditch inlets, curb inlets and like structures;
- Water vaults, valves, meters, fire hydrants, and like structures;
- Natural Gas service vaults, valves, meters, and like structures;
- Electrical and communication service vaults, ducting, junction boxes, risers, kiosks, meters and connections, etc.;
- Traffic control poles, lights, vaults, junction boxes, risers, kiosks, loops, etc.;
- Power and light poles, together with associated guy wires and poles;
- Pavement cuts indicating the presence of underground utilities.
- Utility location paint marks placed by others pursuant to a ??One-Call? utility locate request.
- Planimetric features including
- Mapping of collected data shall be performed in a current version of AutoCAD Civil 3d and include:
- All mapped features segregated in an orderly layering system,
- Collected planimetric, utility, and vegetation features shown,
- Sewer and drainage structures labelled with structure type and rim and invert elevations
- DTM Surface model (Civil3d format) showing 1?? contours with 5?? index contours.
- Resolved right of way limits and individual property lines, segregated by layers appropriately
- Mapping shall include point data for all control and boundary monuments, segregated by appropriate layering and fully described as to the character of the monument.
- Sheet files titled ??Existing Conditions? appropriate for use in the design plan set shall be prepared in accordance with City of Beaverton CAD Standards.
Planning phase will heavily rely on available GIS resources including tax lot mapping
This suggests that GIS resources will be the basis of the ROW configuration in the planning phase?
If you have ROW mapping available, that would be a much more robust basis for planning (decisions such as should we plan to realign to avoid this area with inadequate ROW -or- there will be acquisition on 5 parcels -or- we'll need to have a contingency budget for a retaining wall here to avoid a take).
If there is no ROW mapping available, I'd want to know that in the planning phase so that I could decide if a ROW mapping effort was appropriate.
Either way - you need to have a defensible understanding of the ROW mapping situation in the planning phase - GIS resources wouldn't be defensible if you go through preliminary design and find out that there's a ROW issue driving a multi-year delay or big money cure.
$1 in planning = $10 in design = $100 in construction
Might not be a thing there, but a LUCO map and permits to survey are SOP for DOT projects.?ÿ
Also, I'm finding private locators better, faster and in the long run cheaper than dealing with one-call, but I haven't done a DOT project since I've canned one call for most of my work.?ÿ
?ÿ
Looks concise.?ÿ You've pretty much got all your bases covered.?ÿ I'm guessing the "defined survey area" would be included in project specific verbiage.?ÿ
The reason I mention that is because of trouble we ran into at ODOT when we put together similar instructions for consultants.?ÿ The engineers always wanted the DTM to extend far enough outside of the scope (usually the RW line) to detect possible drainage problems, and the consultants had a bad habit of 'stopping' at the fence.?ÿ We eventually added instructions for shots at a minimum of 25' outside of the RW but allowed circumstantially-driven variances when approved by the (owner) client.
That at least fostered a line of communications.?ÿ
The surface model specs are actually doable...............
Could be in the definition of what is planning phase and what is design phase. I can't possibly be wringing out right of way resolutions everytime somebody in the planning department gets the idea du jour. Besides, the tax mapping hereabouts is fairly reliable, at least as to right of way widths and such.?ÿ
Those specs come from ODOT's Confidence Point Analysis?ÿwhich has been a thing for at least 15 years.?ÿ
One-call Oregon is required to mark for survey by state law. So they are reasonably reliable. The water and gas take the task fairly seriously. The electrical and comm, not as much - but its not so critical either.
Washington State one-call is hit or miss. Requesting one-call locates in Oklahoma was a waste of time.
Anyway, a part of this scope yet to be written is for the design support and right of way acquisition phases which will include provision for private locates and vacumn excavation in critical areas.?ÿ ?ÿ?ÿ
As a surveyor, you likely take this as given, but...
Design Phase
"Survey & Mapping work to be performed under the direction of Licensed Professional Surveyor, Licensed in the State of Oregon."
Many specify 25' beyond boundaries, yet I have never found that anyone obtained the right of entry for such work. So...we always agree, with the caveat of client to obtain right of entry. If we can get it, great! But, we are not hopping over fences and getting shot.
Yeah, I think that .2' for graded areas is a bit optimistic, especially if your rod point sinks in half of that...
?ÿ
Using a topo shoe cuts down on that. And if the rod sinks in a tenth with a topo shoe on it may not be properly called a graded area.
Consider, for example, a mowed grass area in a city park. Is that graded or natural ground? Well, I'd like to shoot for the precision of graded, but if a few spots in my model don't quite pass I'm going to claim it's natural ground. As surveyor for the city I'll accept that from a consultant unless the project is to build a fountain/water park in the middle of that area. In which case I'll have to ask for the model to be tightened up.?ÿ
This is quite an urbanized area. I do need fairly tight surveys done.?ÿ ?ÿ ?ÿ ?ÿ
my $0.02:
?ÿ
Signs, both public and private ///// All accessible Signs
"at breast height"?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ?ÿ use a distance, you used it with the Ornimentals
natural ground surfaces to +/- 0.5??;?ÿ better to use? "Undisturbed earth"
?ÿ
Also, under monuments, maybe something like: "Monuments will have clearly specified project Northing, Easting and Elevation and monument description shown on the face of the map."
Searching the CAD file for those points...ugh.