Notifications
Clear all

Math Problem

25 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
9 Views
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 9921
Registered
Topic starter
 
Posted by: @holy-cow

There should be adjoiners who are also impacted by these mistakes.

For this there are three, my client (Deed #2), Deed #1 and the owner south of my client. The landowner south of my client has the proper bearing.

 
Posted : October 18, 2022 11:07 am
(@lurker)
Posts: 925
Registered
 

Previous owner? Simpson? Manson? Ramirez?

 
Posted : October 18, 2022 1:08 pm
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 9921
Registered
Topic starter
 
Posted by: @lurker

Previous owner? Simpson? Manson? Ramirez?

Not that kinda of famous, lol

 
Posted : October 18, 2022 1:46 pm
(@dave-o)
Posts: 434
Registered
 
Posted by: @mightymoe

Both Holy and Bill are correct.

The old typewriter might have had an issue with the 9 and 0.?ÿ

Change the 40 to 49 on Deed #2 and change the 20 to 29 for the 20-06-00 call and everything works. I had the added resource of looking at a photo and knew the common line using the 20-06 was 80 some feet west of a fence line and the fence had a big kink in it.?ÿ

Wow!

 
Posted : October 18, 2022 2:37 pm
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 9921
Registered
Topic starter
 

The monuments consist of two No.5 rebar, three 1-1/2" aluminum caps along the common line, they fit well to the description when it's changed and they fit well to the other monuments at the POB and for the remainder of the tracts.?ÿ

The three aluminum caps are the soft types and two do not show any markings, however, when rubbed and carefully washed one has the PE&LS number of a surveyor/engineer that worked at the firm contracted to split up the parcels.?ÿ

Of course, the descriptions don't call out any monument and there isn't a drawing, I'm still excepting the monuments. l

?ÿ

 
Posted : October 19, 2022 5:47 am
Page 2 / 2