AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

LR Bluetooth Baud Rates

6 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
924 Views
jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7477
Member Founder, Sustainer
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I've run a Leica TCRA1102plus for the last 4 years over a Parani BT connection. I use a baud rate of 19200 because that's as high as the Leica goes, and it seems to work fine. But the Leica is over 10 years old, no longer supported by the manufacturer, and has started to misbehave on occasion, so I recently bought a GeoMax Zoom80 with a BT handle. The SurvCE manual says to run the GeoMax at 115200. I'm wondering if the additional speed is really needed, and if trying to maintain it will decrease range.

Anyone have experience with this?


 
Posted : January 1, 2016 11:40 pm
shawn-billings
(@shawn-billings)
Posts: 2691
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I may be wrong. Been wrong before, but I think that the actual radio transmission between Bluetooth devices is always at a baud rate of 115200. The selectable baud rate is for the serial interface between the device and the Bluetooth adapter. So you'd go from the Leica instrument to the Bluetooth adapter over serial at 19200. Then from the Bluetooth adapter to the Bluetooth adapter, it's transmitting at 115200. Then from the Bluetooth adapter to the data collector it's back to 19200 again.
John Evers would probably have a more knowledgeable answer for you.


 
Posted : January 2, 2016 5:39 pm
John Evers
(@john-evers)
Posts: 144
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Shawn,

You nailed it!


 
Posted : January 3, 2016 7:44 am
jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7477
Member Founder, Sustainer
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

It sounds like I'm good to go at 15200 from end-to-end. Thanks!


 
Posted : January 3, 2016 11:10 am
jules-j
(@jules-j)
Posts: 724
Free
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Shawn Billings, post: 351477, member: 6521 wrote: I may be wrong. Been wrong before, but I think that the actual radio transmission between Bluetooth devices is always at a baud rate of 115200. The selectable baud rate is for the serial interface between the device and the Bluetooth adapter. So you'd go from the Leica instrument to the Bluetooth adapter over serial at 19200. Then from the Bluetooth adapter to the Bluetooth adapter, it's transmitting at 115200. Then from the Bluetooth adapter to the data collector it's back to 19200 again.
John Evers would probably have a more knowledgeable answer for you.

Jim Frame, post: 351529, member: 10 wrote: It sounds like I'm good to go at 15200 from end-to-end. Thanks!

:-S


 
Posted : January 3, 2016 12:10 pm

jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7477
Member Founder, Sustainer
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Jules J., post: 351537, member: 444 wrote: :-S

Oops! Missed a 1...


 
Posted : January 3, 2016 1:10 pm