AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

leica disto D8

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
375 Views
davidinbrisbane
(@davidinbrisbane)
Posts: 86
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I have the D8, the top model, I brought it to this large project in China, thinking I could use it somewhere, I did think of the vertical control, setting the benchmarks up the building, especially in cold weather.
Jim Frame is correct, you need a steady hand or a bracket of sorts or it is practically useless.
Whilst the specs are impressive, most of what it does can be done with a t.s. and even though mine has the zoom lens to see the object point, you cant clearly see that much anyway.
Who can see something 100 metres, I did think it would come in handy for floor grid set out without setting up the jigger, or again, more accurate than the tapes in cold weather, but with the floor undulations, again it was useless.
The beam is only 1 cm or so from the face of the unit, so where the concrete is uneven, you cant get an end to end measure.Even with offset brackets off the floor, like a square etc., but then you have vert. issues from the points you are measuring, so a tape becomes as accurate.
Also for long shots, you have to stay perpendicular or square, and even a steady hand is not enough.
If I were to use it for repetitive special purposes, I would have some sort of bracket made to clamp to whatever I need, like the flange on an I beam. Square columns would be an issue, unless you had a magnetic clamp, then the laser would need to be some distance to save possible magnetic interference.
So it has stayed in the drawer for months, I guess for certifying rooms,non critical measurements etc , they are fine, but its been an expensive toy.

I have lived without one, and will again, short internal fixture measurements maybe, I came off a 500 mill court project in Australia, lots of contractors had them, but rarely used them.

The same with the Leica Sprinter, i took it back and got the na2, i could focus and read faster than the digital level, but they are good for certain things.
Hope this helps


 
Posted : April 27, 2012 5:21 pm
CSS
 CSS
(@css)
Posts: 231
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

We have them for doing offsets to trees, etc for topo surveys. While we don't use them extensively, I'd hate not to have one available.

I wouldn't even think of using them in preference to a jigger for setout, as recording the data is important to us.

It's also too easy, imo, to change the reading offset (from back of disto, to front, etc). That's a nasty error to make.


 
Posted : April 27, 2012 6:45 pm