AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

For the javad ls users out there, who use the tilt sensor

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
326 Views
nate-the-surveyor
(@nate-the-surveyor)
Posts: 10538
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm curious. Does the wiggle of the LS, being on a mono-pod, affect the observation? Does it hurt the solution, or help the solution? What affect does the fact that if wiggles some, have on it? IF you need a more accurate shot, is it better to turn this feature off, and use a plumb pole? With Bi-pod?
Thanks!
Nate


 
Posted : June 14, 2015 5:51 pm
mattsib79
(@mattsib79)
Posts: 376
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Nate,

I generally never use the tilt correction unless I have a pin under a fence or something similar. I have put a bubble on the supplied Javad pole. I use that and a regular seco rod with 5/8 to 1/4 adapter.


 
Posted : June 14, 2015 8:16 pm
nate-the-surveyor
(@nate-the-surveyor)
Posts: 10538
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I'm still using the Legacy E units. They have big antennae, on them. Called Leg Ants. A small amount of circular motion can help them go fixed, in poor environments, where double checks are totally normal.


 
Posted : June 14, 2015 10:08 pm
jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7465
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I don't use the Javad pole or the tilt sensor, preferring to use a quick-disconnect adapter on my standard SECO pole with 10-minute bubble. I know that a bubble that sensitive is overkill for RTK, but I like to keep the error sources down when it's easy to do, and I use the same pole for prism and RTK.

I don't see the value in the tilt sensor, at least for my uses. It has to be calibrated regularly, which is a nuisance.


 
Posted : June 14, 2015 10:27 pm
duane-frymire
(@duane-frymire)
Posts: 1923
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I believe the rod they now supply has a bubble on it. You can see the bubble on the screen via the bottom camera (triumph LS). I have the original pole like Matt, and use the tilt mostly. Set four control points in a fairly tough environment a few weeks ago (RTN). Total station set ups on them agreed within 0.02' horizontal. Calibration is simple and I don't find it a nuisance, but understand how some might. Tell onlookers you have to wave your magic wand first to get the position.


 
Posted : June 15, 2015 6:18 am