Found this while reviewing a survey by another firm.?ÿ BTW, I am thrilled to find someone ended up making some money off this old loon.?ÿ I turned her down on three different occasions.?ÿ Don't know, but there might be some wacky tabaccy growing somewhere in the middle that overgrown disaster of a tract.
The piece being severed is roughly 40 acres off the backside of an 80-acre aliquot part.?ÿ Access is to be via an easement from the road to the new tract.?ÿ The description of the easement tract is provided as being about 200 feet along the road frontage, then going back 1200+ feet to the tract, then about 230 feet along the north side of the tract to the west line of the 80 and then back to the road.?ÿ But, it doesn't stop there.?ÿ The plat shows some dotted lines indicating existing trails that enter and leave that easement tract.?ÿ Following the easement area description is the statement that the actual easement will be a uniform 30-foot wide path centered on that path, wherever the?ÿ rear tract owner decides is the best place for that to be.?ÿ A TBD specific easement location.
Remember, I told you she was a loon.
Somewhat similar to some pipeline and utility servitudes/easements whose final location is a width based on the actual installed location of the utility.
Piece of cake.
The bizarre part is that six acres of land is being negatively impacted by an easement that only requires 3/4 of an acre.?ÿ It would have made far more sense to put the area needed along the west line of the remainder tract and sell it rather than making it an easement.?ÿ There is no local authority to prevent that from happening.?ÿ The terrain would allow it.
