Notifications
Clear all

Automated GPS processing tools

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
(@geeoddmike)
Posts: 1556
Registered
Topic starter
 

Hwody,

While users reliant on OPUS and it's variants are having difficulty, there are other automated tools.

For links and some related information see: http://geodesyattamucc.pbworks.com/w/page/13931102/FrontPage#Lab9GPSAutomatedProcessingToolsandAnalysisofResults

Given the limited resources of NGS, I am surprised OPUS is as reliable as it is.

Cheers,

DMM

 
Posted : June 28, 2012 6:24 pm
(@mark-r)
Posts: 304
Registered
 

I found opus to be quite good. Always a good idea to do independent checks, but their results fit typically. I will try your link in the future though. Thanks for sharing.

 
Posted : June 28, 2012 6:31 pm
(@cliff-mugnier)
Posts: 1223
Registered
 

OPUS is supposed to be just a check

to your own observations when properly doing a survey according to NGS Standards. OPUS is certainly not intended to be the final answer.

 
Posted : June 29, 2012 9:31 am