@ashton?ÿ
That won't help though, when after a plan is printed, a builder or homeowner draws an addition, then copies it so it looks like something that's always been part of the plan
@jph Exactly, once the plan is printed all the security benefits of a digital signature are gone.
Wow.?ÿ This is a revival of a thread started over nine years ago on a VERY important subject.?ÿ This place rocks!
@ashton?ÿ
That won't help though, when after a plan is printed, a builder or homeowner draws an addition, then copies it so it looks like something that's always been part of the plan
?ÿ
Which behooves the producer of the original to maintain a sealed (stamped) dated copy and the reception number etc on it to confirm it's prominence.
encumber the system to provide the security, the individual shouldn't have to make such efforts to maintain the validity but still it seems to have to be addressed....
we need better support for the cause for sure.
?ÿ
behooves the producer of the original to maintain a sealed (stamped) dated copy
Or record it with the county office.
Wow.?ÿ This is a revival of a thread started over nine years ago on a VERY important subject.?ÿ This place rocks!
Yes! When I started a new thread, the old one came up and I added to it. I'm sure I saw it before but it's good to read again.?ÿ
?ÿ
This happened to me and ruined a few relationships. The prosecutor agreed all elements of forgery were present, but dropped it due to 'lack of jury appeal'.
?ÿ
After walking through a few cases on the regulator side I should have asked the AG to prosecute for felony false personation. It's easier to prove.?ÿ