AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

SurvCE set collection question

2 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
546 Views
rfc
 rfc
(@rfc)
Posts: 1966
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

In this thread, Royevrus suggested a way to make Carlson.rw5 files look like TDS .rw5 files, for creation of dat files into Star*net:

https://surveyorconnect.com/threads/need-help-importing-survce-rw5-through-microsurveycad-to-star-net.326451/#post-368254

It's been working great, until I came upon this oddity:

What I tried to do in SurvCE was rather than do a set, then do another set etc. (same set of points), when it gets to the list of points to collect sets on, I put, for example:
"1800"
"1800"
"1800"...taking a foresight on 1800, then another, then another, then reverse, reverse, reverse...then the backsight.

But what starts out looking fine, giving me the back sight data to 1600:

--Set Collection with Obs Order 123...321...
OC,OP1700,N 427097.64340,E 1617857.41604,EL1246.050,--
LS,HI5.1900,HR5.1000
BK,OP1700,BP1600,BS5.2324,BC0.0000
LS,HI5.1900,HR5.1000
BD,OP1700,FP1600,AR0.0000,ZE100.1418,SD257.796000,--
FD,OP1700,FP1800,AR215.2642,ZE81.2759,SD282.490000,--
FR,OP1700,FP1800,AR35.2651,ZE278.3205,SD282.488000,--
BR,OP1700,FP1600,AR179.5943,ZE259.4531,SD257.794000,--
--SS,OP1700,FP1600,AR0.0000,ZE100.1423,SD257.795000,--

And what looks like proper foresight data:

BD,OP1700,FP1600,AR0.0000,ZE100.1418,SD257.796000,--
FD,OP1700,FP1800,AR215.2649,ZE81.2752,SD282.489000,--
FR,OP1700,FP1800,AR35.2633,ZE278.3202,SD282.489000,--
BR,OP1700,FP1600,AR179.5943,ZE259.4531,SD257.794000,--

And again:

BD,OP1700,FP1600,AR0.0000,ZE100.1418,SD257.796000,--
FD,OP1700,FP1800,AR215.2651,ZE81.2753,SD282.488000,--
FR,OP1700,FP1800,AR35.2645,ZE278.3208,SD282.489000,--
BR,OP1700,FP1600,AR179.5943,ZE259.4531,SD257.794000,--

But then it looks like something goes whacko here:

BR,OP1700,FP1600,AR179.5943,ZE259.4531,SD257.794000,--
BR,OP1700,FP1600,AR179.5943,ZE259.4531,SD257.794000,--
BR,OP1700,FP1600,AR179.5943,ZE259.4531,SD257.794000,--
BR,OP1700,FP1600,AR179.5943,ZE259.4531,SD257.794000,--
BR,OP1700,FP1600,AR179.5943,ZE259.4531,SD257.794000,--
BR,OP1700,FP1600,AR179.5943,ZE259.4531,SD257.794000,--

I'm ready to dump this file and do it again, rather than try to create the SS results, but it begs the question:

Is it improper to populate the SurvCE "Set Collection List" screen with multiple instances of the same point?
Is the above just the results of a fritzy DC cable (it's been acting weird)?
Something else?


 
Posted : April 25, 2016 6:40 am
rfc
 rfc
(@rfc)
Posts: 1966
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Bump...


 
Posted : April 28, 2016 9:02 am