AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

More Star*net interpretation

3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
488 Views
rfc
 rfc
(@rfc)
Posts: 1966
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Slugging my way through finding "Elevation differences" (primarily due to botched measure ups in SurvCE). Star*net shows this:


I see there's a problem with station 900. But if the StdRes's are so high, why is 900-800 the same as what I measured from 800-900 (28.9361)?
If I messed up a prism height at one setup to another but not the other to the one, wouldn't these be different?


 
Posted : December 21, 2015 6:29 pm
bill93
(@bill93)
Posts: 9977
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I don't understand the reference to "what I measured" because there is no display of your measurement values. The values you posted are the elevation differences between the adjusted coordinates of those points. So every occurrence will result in the same adjusted difference displayed.

I see one 800-900 and two 900-800 measurements represented The two 900-800 must have had exactly the same measurement numbers in order to get the same residual. No? That residual is different from the 800-900 residual because other measurements (700-800, 600-900 etc) pulled the best fit coordinates a different amount from the 800-900 versus 900-800 measurements.

What was the question ... ?


 
Posted : December 21, 2015 7:02 pm
rfc
 rfc
(@rfc)
Posts: 1966
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Bill93, post: 350107, member: 87 wrote: I don't understand the reference to "what I measured" because there is no display of your measurement values. The values you posted are the elevation differences between the adjusted coordinates of those points. So every occurrence will result in the same adjusted difference displayed.

I see one 800-900 and two 900-800 measurements represented The two 900-800 must have had exactly the same measurement numbers in order to get the same residual. No? That residual is different from the 800-900 residual because other measurements (700-800, 600-900 etc) pulled the best fit coordinates a different amount from the 800-900 versus 900-800 measurements.

What was the question ... ?

Oops. You're right. My bad. I posted the adjusted coordinates.They would be identical, wouldn't they? I looked at the originals; then went back to the field book and found an HI that was not entered in the data collector. Once I changed that, the residuals all dropped like a rock. I've got to develop a better procedure for making sure that every HI and HR is entered in the DC.


 
Posted : December 21, 2015 7:43 pm