That is all.
You suck. 🙂
How long has it been? 7 or 8 years I suppose? He must be eligible for parole one of these days.
Almost eight years...
With 71 years for attempted murder I don't think he'll be out this year, probably not next year either. BTW, he has lost at least two appeals.
If Indiana had their DOC on line we might be able to see when he is first eligible for parole.
Google him. He's been busy filing civil suits against the arresting officers and the prison system for not allowing him to sell a book he wrote.
> BTW, he has lost at least two appeals.
It looks like he won at least one appeal: Evans v. Polson
This 2010 decision reversed a lower-court decision denying Hub's excessive-force claim against the arresting officers. I don't know if anything has happened since. But what the heck, he doesn't have anything better to do for the next few decades.
I thought he had some mail fraud charges pending in Kentucky also.
> Google him. He's been busy filing civil suits against the arresting officers and the prison system for not allowing him to sell a book he wrote.
That's kind of funny. Prisoners are not allowed to profit from any book sales or movie rights while incarcerated for things they have done[or not]. Should adjudication come later that would find him not guilty, then he can come out with his stuff. I have heard of a few of these types of cases, but they are very rare.
71 years does seem excessive however. I have known 2 (two) convicted felon murderers in my time. Both were "crimes of passion" having caught their respective wives in bed with a lover. Both shot them all dead. One did a 20 year stretch (out in fifteen) and the other did 7 (seven - out in four). Both admitted to me in person they killed these people without remorse. Neither was premeditated. That makes me wonder about Ty's situation. He didn't (far as we know) didn't actually kill someone and gets 70 years. The two fellers I met openly admit to killing their victims and their sentences didn't come close to that.
premeditation is key I think.
His past felonies, I suppose, lead to the aggravating circumstances. I don't know about that stuff really - thank God.
If I recall from the old days at rpls.com he was staking lines for fencing without a license. I really don't remember the details so perhaps I shouldn't say. But, if he was doing that staking out without a license in a state that requires such, that would certainly make him nothing less than a con-artist of the first order.
I actually talked to him on the phone a few times before all that stuff went down and he really didn't seem like that kind of person to me.
Then again, con-artists are masters of bull-squirt [substitute squirt for excrement].
E
> 71 years does seem excessive however....
That is a lot. And with no possibility of parole until he is a very old man. I take it as a measure of just how serious the crime was and how dangerous a criminal he is.
