I wonder if it is possible to edit the attached rinex file in order to improve it OPUS stats.?ÿ when I run QC it reports that G18 is unhealthy. when I remove G18 OPUS reports that I do not have 2 hours of data. ?Also the the QC reports something unknown, the receiver type??ÿ ?ÿAny suggestions on how to remove sats in individual sections for cycle slip I guess. thanks for your help
?ÿ please delete .txt at the end of .19o file. It wouls not upload otherwise thanks for your help?ÿ
I'd run it again next week to get Rapid results instead of Ultra-rapid, just in case more CORS data comes in that helps.
With only 40% of the observations used, I'm not sure you can ever tweak this data set into good results.?ÿ What was the environment, too many trees and/or power pole wires and guy wires?
I dunno Dane...
After looking at the RINEX file, the station location (Google Earth), and the OPUS Report, I suspect that there isn't really much hope.
OPUS used ONLY 40% of the observations (a very bad sign).
The L2 P2 data in the RINEX file is very "hit/miss" (another really bad sign)
The location of the remote station doesn't look very "GPS friendly" to start with.
It is possible (but far from a sure thing), that a more modern GNSS unit (say an iGage IG3s) MIGHT return a cleaner observation file, but probably not. I would suggest a "better" station location, but those look to be few and far between in that area.
Loyal