Another Beerlegger and I are having an offline conversation about TEQC, which has brought up an interesting (to me anyway) question.
How many folks (Land Surveyors) are actually USING TEQC in their normal practice?
Just wondering,
Loyal
Not me, no need to process static data.
Chr.
I use it in my normal practice, but that's not to say that I use it very often.?ÿ It's a tool in the box that I use mostly when I run into a problem data file.
Constantly. I download .t01 or .t02 files from the receivers, convert to .dat and .tgd with runpkr, and then create rinex files from the .tgd with teqc (all in batch files). Also occasionally use it for QC, etc.?ÿ
I am with Jim Frame, occasionally a file needs tweaking to pass OPUS muster. I use WINteqc when I need teqc.
Paul in PA
?ÿ