AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

New tax law

23 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
1,006 Views
Empire
(@empire)
Posts: 1
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Are Land Surveyors linked to the new 20% tax law that architects and engineers are qualified to get.


 
Posted : December 7, 2018 5:41 pm
jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7465
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

According to a webinar recently given to CLSA members by a tax accountant, the answer is yes.


 
Posted : December 7, 2018 5:47 pm
antcrook
(@antcrook)
Posts: 287
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Is there a link available to that webinar?


 
Posted : December 8, 2018 7:43 pm
hillsidesurveyor
(@hillsidesurveyor)
Posts: 97
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Would someone be able to explain more.

My accountant said I can take advantage of the break given to pass through LLCs. Is this the same thing or something different?


 
Posted : December 9, 2018 10:04 am
jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7465
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Is this the same thing or something different?

Same thing.?ÿ A recording of the CLSA webinar can be found here.

?ÿ


 
Posted : December 9, 2018 10:26 am

antcrook
(@antcrook)
Posts: 287
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thanks Jim.


 
Posted : December 9, 2018 7:29 pm
duane-frymire
(@duane-frymire)
Posts: 1923
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thanks Jim, very informative.?ÿ I'm firing my last tax guy.


 
Posted : December 10, 2018 7:39 am
holy-cow
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25672
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

First, we must be profit making enterprises.


 
Posted : December 10, 2018 8:38 am
hillsidesurveyor
(@hillsidesurveyor)
Posts: 97
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thank You


 
Posted : December 10, 2018 10:41 am
Hollandbriscoe
(@hollandbriscoe)
Posts: 185
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Well according to my accountant we are, 20% as well as the $12000 standard deduction.


 
Posted : December 19, 2018 9:06 pm

antcrook
(@antcrook)
Posts: 287
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I just hired this accounting firm to do my taxes for 2018. They also reviewed and amended my tax returns from the last 3 years and were able to get me a rather large tax refund.


 
Posted : January 18, 2019 1:41 am
shelby-h-griggs-pls
(@shelby-h-griggs-pls)
Posts: 934
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Just attended a CPA presentation at PLSO (Oregon) last Friday. Even CPA's are not 100% sure of this, some say it was an over sight, others say if they had intended surveyors to be included they would have. Audits on the 2017 tax year will be about three years from now, so that is likely when tax courts will rule if by chance it wasn't an over sight to include surveyors.

Your risk tolerance will decide which camp you fall in.

SHG


 
Posted : January 21, 2019 12:05 pm
jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7465
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I don't have the statute in front of me, but my recollection is that the language is not ambiguous with regard to surveyors.?ÿ The legislative intent might not be comprehensively reflected in the language, but if Congress amends the law or the IRS interprets it to exclude surveyors, the worst that can happen is I'll have to pay back taxes.?ÿ They can't assess penalties when you follow the letter of the law.


 
Posted : January 21, 2019 2:40 pm
shelby-h-griggs-pls
(@shelby-h-griggs-pls)
Posts: 934
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Actually it is ambiguous unless you assume that "engineers and architects" includes land surveyors. Rather that was an over sight or the intent remains to be seen. Reasonably one might think that was just an over sight, BUT my understanding is there is no official guidance on that. Agree that worst is back taxes.

SHG


 
Posted : January 21, 2019 8:27 pm
Norman_Oklahoma
(@norman-oklahoma)
Posts: 8310
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 
Posted by: Shelby H. Griggs PLS

Just attended a CPA presentation at PLSO (Oregon) last Friday. Even CPA's are not 100% sure of this, some say it was an over sight, others say if they had intended surveyors to be included they would have. Audits on the 2017 tax year will be about three years from now, so that is likely when tax courts will rule if by chance it wasn't an over sight to include surveyors.

Your risk tolerance will decide which camp you fall in.

SHG

I was in the room with Shelby. He is accurately reporting what the CPA said. It was the main topic of the presentation.?ÿ His opinion was that Surveyors are included, and he was quite willing to prepare client returns on that assumption. He was not willing to guarantee that a future audit would not prove him wrong.

So if you do take the deduction I suggest that you bank the refund for a few years.?ÿ


 
Posted : January 22, 2019 1:38 pm

jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7465
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

The IRS released rules today that strengthen the interpretation that surveyors will be allowed to take the deduction.?ÿ There are two key points:

1.?ÿ The legislation specifically disallows the deduction for "any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners."?ÿ It's conceivable that a land surveyor could be categorized as such.

2.?ÿ The legislation specifically names engineers and architects as allowed, but surveyors aren't mentioned, which meant that surveyors might be lumped into the category of consulting, which is specifically disallowed.

However, today's 247-page ruling notice includes the following that addresses item 1:

If Congressional intent was to exclude all service businesses, Congress clearly could have drafted such a rule. Accordingly, the final regulations retain the proposed rule limiting the meaning of the reputation or skill clause to fact patterns in which an individual or RPE is engaged in the trade or business of receiving income from endorsements, the licensing of an individualƒ??s likeness or features, and appearance fees.

It also addresses item 2:

The performance of services in the field of consulting does not include the performance of services other than advice and counsel

I think we're good.


 
Posted : January 22, 2019 11:23 pm
rankin_file
(@rankin_file)
Posts: 4078
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Good thing NSPS was on top of this.....


 
Posted : January 23, 2019 6:27 am
ekillo
(@ekillo)
Posts: 559
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I was told by an accountant that a I could not take it because I do not have employees.

Ed


 
Posted : January 23, 2019 7:19 am
jhframe
(@jim-frame)
Posts: 7465
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I was told by an accountant that a I could not take it because I do not have employees.

I recommend finding another accountant.


 
Posted : January 23, 2019 10:28 am
shelby-h-griggs-pls
(@shelby-h-griggs-pls)
Posts: 934
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 
Posted by: Jim Frame

I think we're good.

I guess we will find out in 2020 or 2021 when the first audits of 2017 taxes happen.

I think the stance to go with is assume we are covered, BUT don't be shocked if back taxes are due in a few years.


 
Posted : January 23, 2019 4:13 pm

Page 1 / 2