Land Swap?
> Couldn't they exchange parcels of land?
Not an option due to the terms of the trust which owns the park land.
HOLY COW
> Here in CT you need a survey to even bring a plan for new construction before P&Z. You can't get a CO without an asbuilt. Strange.
HERE on Sanibel, you need a Survey to put in a PAVER BRICK DRIVEWAY!
I realize it's somewhat rough
Yeah, I think the real question is not how it was approved but how or who staked it out on the ground.:-/
The original court ...
Surely, the common pleas court record should have evidence of who forwarded an opinion on the line location and a given location to build a house.
If the "survey", was done by the engineer, did the engineer intend to "fool", the governing agency? Did the developer decide he needed a more viable building location(that pond bothers me), and took a chance?
Who were the surveyors for the plaintiff, defendant and maybe even for the court and did they have differing opinions?
Evidently, this last court only ruled on the remedy.
I realize it's somewhat rough
> Yeah, I think the real question is not how it was approved but how or who staked it out on the ground.:-/
Jered,
Yes, that is the 1.8 million dollar question, isn't it? However, if my rough understanding is correct, I would bet that no one staked it, unless you count the general contractor "staking" it for himself based on that site plan that he passed off as a survey of some kind. I really don't see that anyone formally staked the foundation/house location.