Bill93 ?ÿ Thank you for your input but I don't understand what you mean when you (and Norman) mean when you say that 180 is not accounted for??? In th...

Hi Norman ?ÿ Thank you for your reply. Did you use a StarNet converter to create that dat file or did you write it up yourself? - I used the converter...

Fantastic. Such a relief. Looking forward to posting again and asking silly questions. Thanks ?ÿ

Hi ConradI really appreciate your insight. Your comments have certainly made me think a little deeper into this.You have a way of picking up on things...

Hi ConradThank you for your input.I have to be honest I am surprised that there isn't a definitive answer as to what 68.269% means in the context of m...

Thanks guys.A follow on question which I think I have confused myself about which is when setting the significance level for the Chi Square test a val...

Kent McMillan, post: 444774, member: 3 wrote: I don't think that is what the standard error of a direction is intended to represent in Star*Net, thoug...

Scott Zelenak, post: 29064, member: 327 wrote: Occaisionally, I have the 'opportunity' to explain these standards to other surveyors. I often ask oth...

Scott Zelenak, post: 440339, member: 327 wrote: 1 arc second equals 4.848 X 10^ -6 radians.Once again thank you for your help.

squowse, post: 440424, member: 7109 wrote: or 7.204775 x tan (0?ø0'0.55") = 0.000019i am pretty sure that the adjusted distance is used, but I don;t t...

Scott Zelenak, post: 440317, member: 327 wrote: 7 meters times 0.55 seconds times 0.000 00485 equals 0.000 019 meters.OrDistance times angular residua...

squowse, post: 440231, member: 7109 wrote: It's a new feature added to 8.2 (i think). It's basically the residual angle multiplied by the horizontal d...