I think you're right Alan. We've been doing subdivisions for a while of varying sizes. One thing I learned early on was that the initial survey around...

Only in an extreme situation could I see the need for reproducing a subdivision bearing relation independent of monuments. Specifically - large lots w...

:good:

transoms... you've heard that one too, huh? lol

We've been using Icad version for several months now. I came from Carlson with Acad 2002. Early release was a little buggy. We could still function, b...

Yes, it is important to make sure the compensation is there for the improved capabilities. And that's not always an easy thing to figure. For instance...

Perhaps... Perhaps...> I have two questions for you. When you put a solid bearing on one of your surveys do you go off the deep end in a fashion li...

Perhaps... Perhaps...Perhaps, Mr. Burkholder is off track in proposing a mandatory bearing relation to something more reproducible than what is curren...

I love a good solid reproducible bearing reference. I like where you are going, I'd only have two caveats:For giving the point where the azimuth was b...

Been a few months since I played around with one but I don't recall it being very difficult to set up the scan mode on the gun.

well done.

right on.

I use breaklines for almost every point in a topo, excepting grid shots on uniform surfaces. DTM/Contouring software generally does fine on a channel ...

He accepts your terms or he doesn't. End of story. From the sounds of it you've never worked for this cracker before so it won't be any loss if you ne...