I think you are letting yourself get confused on the main point. There was no other evidence of those back corners of the twelve foot strip. Had there...

But, ShawnMr Cow,If that is even your real name. Try to keep up. I never suggested otherwise. I mention the 12.005 just to highlight how good this sur...

Yeah.

They sure seem to be spending a lot on marketing.

Virgnina &cloudy dayslike like like

Well, JPH. In the above 12' strip example, I guess you'd go ahead and turn the angle off of those two axles 12.005 feet apart and run 2000' to the bac...

SHAWN BILLINGS:good:

I used "forced" because there was such a better line available - an adjudicated, well monumented and described line. It seemed like a real let down to...

> Guess I don't understand the logic. The original surveyor screwed up the so-called reproducible bearing and you went with occupation (and most li...

> I'm going to say in the first example, the problem was the property owner didn't maintain the boundaries, not the basis of bearing problem you de...

> I understand that more data is better than less data, but your previous statement of "the extra expense of scouring the subdivision for monuments...

Exactly why Reproducible Bearings shouldn't be used:good:

On first read, Nate, I can see the validity of your questions. But put into the perspective of what we do as surveyors, I think those arguments fall f...

Don't forget. Legally it must also be notarized. No reason you can't write your own deed. As Kent mentions wording is important. Also there must be co...

I like it!

Sounds like a good summary.

Thanks, Glen.

Straw Man...You can clearly look at the replies to this thread and others like it and find several examples of individuals suggesting "North really do...

Bearing Basis for Profit> In 100 years, or 10 or whatever, your method of finding and defining North will be superseded by another, better method. ...