It doesn't really answer your question, but...that sounds right to me Bryan.We don't tax for topo but do for boundary. and yes, it sucks.

email me. [email protected]

> 1) Supply project on grid. Use average combined scale factor in field to reduce ground distances to grid distances. Try to persuade engineer t...

Just so you feel properly smug about your day we were pounding iron in the hard ground under the hot sun. We were staking a cemetery so no brush cutti...

Definitely poor nomenclature. Might be clearer to call it NAD83 from ITRF or something similar.

Sweet. Hope it works!

🙂

Problem is GPS is out of style it's GNSS now so why not skip right to GeNeSiS?

Yeah. I think you found it.

Almost sounds like an itrf datum vs a nad83 datum. There is a 4+ foot difference in Texas between the two vertically.

One other thing I'd consider is stop and go. In this I would still occupy my points for ten minutes but leave the receiver collecting between occupati...

Good stuff Shelby. Looks solid to me.

Please don't just take my word for it but I've had good success at 5 miles with 5 minute occupations. I would have to look at some old files to see. I...

I really like RTK but I'd still consider static for this job. I don't know how far the baselines from base to rover will be, but I've had pretty good ...

SPC50 by Chuck RushtonSPC50 by Chuck Rushton loaded on my HP 49g+ calculator. I seldom load Corpscon now unless I need to do a 27 conversion. Chuck's ...

Time for me to be contraryI'll be counter contrary. I agree about working outside of expertise being unethical. I would think that as long as you rese...

:good: