AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
loyal
loyal
@loyal
Free
Joined: July 2, 2010 11:11 pm
Last seen: June 28, 2026 8:47 pm
Topics: 212 / Replies: 3523
Reply
RE: Geodetic Control Diagrams and Triangulation Diagrams for TX

I have a few in Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, but never gave a crap about Texacus.;-) Loyal

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Lambert Conformal Conic Projection

RIGHT!I forgot that part...(k @ mid-point)Thanks,Loyal

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Lambert Conformal Conic Projection

It's been awhile since I needed to do it, but as I recall:k' = (k1 + k2 + 4((k1+k2)/2))/6k1 = Scale Factor @ Pt.1k2 = Scale Factor @ Pt.2Loyal

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Please talk me back into State Plane

talk me into H, Loyal.I would say that Ellipsoid Height (H) could be problematical in some cases, which is why I tend to like Geocentric X/Y/Z (folks ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Please talk me back into State Plane

Sorry...Lat/Lon/H (or maybe geocentric X/Y/Z) is my choice.Nothing ambiguous about LLH (or XYZ for that matter), so long as you clarify the Datum and ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Pics from the field...unusual marks-

Markings are SOP...See Page 39, Section 76, 1902 Manual.As I recall it started with the 1894 Manual, but it may have been earlier, I would have to che...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Pics from the field...unusual marks-

Markings are SOP...for that particular corner (Center of the Township), under certain circumstances and certain Manuals. Quite common in these parts i...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: A way to avoid changing record.

Well....in the Public Land States, I would submit that most of what we do falls into one of the following categories. 1. Original Survey (probably wit...

13 years ago
Reply
13 years ago
Reply
RE: Single point Basis of Bearing

BillGene is still chasing Mineral Surveys, and will be giving a talk about Mineral Survey matters at the 2014 Rocky Mountain Surveyors Summit in Arvad...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Single point Basis of Bearing

Your guess is as good (or bad) as anybody else's.Talk about crappy (virtually non-existent) metadata...Tie in Hilltop-1938 and a few of this yoyo's "c...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Ellipsoids, Datums, and Geoids

A couple of quick (SHORT version) comments:WGS84 (all realizations), is/are both a DATUM and an associated ELLIPSOID. The geometric difference between...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: I could see the fumes

Norman> > That's not exactly how I meant it.I suspected as much.I only wished to clarify what I figured was obvious (to you and me anyway).Loyal

13 years ago
Reply
RE: I could see the fumes

> > I do like LDPs but if a surveyor can't survey in this simple surface coordinate system how in the heck will he figure out an LDP?> If a s...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: One of those mornings, Love hate OpUs

GPS MidnightThe observation does (as Paul pointed out) cross GPS Midnight. This is ONLY a problem when the file is submitted BEFORE the Rapid Ephemeri...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: One of those mornings, Love hate OpUs

Willy;Shoot me the RINEX file, and I'll take a look at it.LDO-at-aol-dot-comLoyal

13 years ago
Reply
Reply
RE: Large Difference In Geoid Height

The NGS Geoid Models have come a LONG WAY since GEOID93.I doubt that .75 meters is really as uncommon as you may think (at least here in Western CONUS...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: NAD 27 or 83

Try this:'Pan' down to the Southwest Corner of a quad, and read the USGS metadata there. It will tell you what Datum the Quadrangle was "drawn" expres...

13 years ago
Page 123 / 187