Jim_H, post: 372888, member: 11536 wrote: Monuments do move, but in this case I don't think it's likely. 0.12' excess from a 1907 plat is actually qu...
The conclusion: Four days ago, I came across this website and posted my original question, which was how it could be that a lot that had its origin in...
Dave Karoly, post: 373021, member: 94 wrote: That is pretty much the best analysis by a lay person I have seen. The lot, legally, is 30' wide (notice ...
Robert Hill, post: 372916, member: 378 wrote: This was never a question concerning survey practice or procedure. This was a zoning problem and had not...
dmyhill, post: 372903, member: 1137 wrote: It [the plat] is not wrong. Okay, "wrong" was probably a poor choice of words. I should have said, "Why w...
Holy Cow, post: 372815, member: 50 wrote: 0.01 feet is effectively NOTHING. Hence, this saga is "Much Ado About Nothing". I agree. But that little ...
FL/GA PLS., post: 372714, member: 379 wrote: After reading your post the real crux of the problem is that you and your neighbors simply do not want a ...
Lee D, post: 372594, member: 7971 wrote: It seems clear to me that the original intent was for the lot to be 30' and the original intent of the zoning...
Brian Allen, post: 372653, member: 1333 wrote: I wouldn't worry about the 0.01 ft. so much, I'd be wondering about the apparent "virtual pin cushions"...
Daniel Ralph, post: 372596, member: 8817 wrote: Regarding the question about precision and accuracy, I think that you should refer to Note 6 on the le...
Tom Adams, post: 372577, member: 7285 wrote: It isn't so much that all surveyors are sloppy, as much as measuring of land is more of a challenge than ...
Dan Dunn, post: 372409, member: 911 wrote: 655.71' is along the center-line of Ashley Avenue, 655.83' is along the sideline of Ashley Avenue. N82nd S...
Daniel Ralph, post: 372525, member: 8817 wrote: In the survey that the poster provided you note that the subject house was about three feet from the l...
Jered McGrath PLS, post: 372523, member: 794 wrote: So the 30.01 seems to be from prorating the longer measured distance against the shorter original ...
rfc, post: 372519, member: 8882 wrote: This is 110% Monday Morning Quarterbacking, but wouldn't the time to raise this very question have been when th...
New information: I was able to scan my paper copy of the latest survey, which was done on 9/14/2015 and have attached it to this post. Because it was ...
It's interesting that you mention siding, because this house actually has less distance to the side property lines than required by zoning law (which ...
Thank you for all the interest being taken in my question and the thoughtfulness and knowledge expressed in so many responses. I appreciate it! Please...
Thank you, Paden. I appreciate your knowledge and expertise. And I like the idea of "protecting the plat" and ensuring that modern and current retrace...
Looks like it's letting me upload PDF files. 🙂 Here is a copy of the original plat map based on the 1907 survey. As you can see, all north-south mea...
