AngelIt is a real pet peeve with me.....if he were to sign his real name, his posts then might make sense?

My correspondence will be made public when I receive an answer.I assume that I had enough background information in my letters.We all know that it is ...

AngelAs you know, he is good at putting his words in posts and accuse me of doing whatever!

will jump at 120,000 ft.

Serious Question for Very Odd LotsLots of questions, but need some sketches as to what you mean.And obviously, there are any number of problems with l...

mightymoeI know what standards are!Maybe somebody from the Forest Service will post those "Positional Tolerance Standards"?

JimThanks

mightymoeMaybe I don't either, please explain!

Yes, the key point being that they did not have to retrace the Standard to close on it, only tied one way, therefore the 1/4 cor. to the south was no...

I think we are saying the same thing.That is, the 10.00 chains would have been proportioned against, the same as the rest of the fractional distance.

I didn't check any of your calculations, but seems all ok and is proportioning.But I did not see any 10.00 held and not proportioned.

That was my thought.

A caution to the original poster: Hardly ever are the actual field measurements identical with the deed distances!Land Surveyors use all evidence of ...

The Standards were run to begin another layer of townships that are regular and then every four townships, a Standard is run again.The townships to th...

I don't refer to it as indexing......it is proportioning all parenthetical distances.

Yes, it is not a matter of holding the ten chains and whatever is the difference,,,,going to the north half. Both distances are proportioned.

Seems to me to be the wrong argument anyway: The city spent a lot of time reminding the court that you cannot adversely possess a road against the gov...

All of this discussion reminds me of how the ROW markers were set along the freeways and seems to be the case where the monuments are ignored and the ...