AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
Brian Allen
Brian Allen
@brian-allen
Member
Joined: March 8, 2011 3:00 pm
Topics: 25 / Replies: 1545
Reply
RE: Record Title and GIS

Was it GCDB by chance???

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Society dues

> In Maryland representatives of the state society attend every board meeting and the board frequently turns to the society for input regarding cha...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Society dues

Obviously, the ideal situation would be (as some states have done) is to have the surveying societies become active in identifying and defining the st...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Society dues

Congratulations on a successful conference, and especially on raising approx $12000 for our scholarship fund.Yes our dues have significantly increased...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: 1/64th corner

> Yes, of course you can. I do it all the time.[sarcasm]And of course if you didn't set them perfectly, I'm gonna fix them for you.[/sarcasm]

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

Kent> Apparently you either haven't read the case that clearly outlines the boundary law principles, or you are willingly ignoring it.> Obviousl...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Record Title and GIS

Be careful what you wish for, it may actually happen. GIS is here to stay and, in many cases, it is seen as authoritative information (even by some su...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

KentApparently you either haven't read the case that clearly outlines the boundary law principles, or you are willingly ignoring it.Carry on.

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

KentThe whole point being, if either one (or both) of the surveyors had been knowledgable about the laws in Utah and their responsibilities as profess...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Mortgage companies

What if the requirements for boundary by agreement (or any other location doctrine) were fulfilled years before the current owner and current (or pros...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Uh oh 2011 California case upholds fence!

Laws are different from rulings> Laws are specific while rulings are based on circumstances about a case.> You have to follow laws which are sta...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Uh oh 2011 California case upholds fence!

Utah as well> I tend to agree to a point. By statute in CA, if adjoining owners want to establish a boundary in a location they determine on the gr...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Uh oh 2011 California case upholds fence!

> dittos> to do less would put you in the "deed staker" category.Doing less would also put one in the "fence line staker" category.More accurate...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Uh oh 2011 California case upholds fence!

> I agree, the court can find there is only one boundary. However, how does the surveyor put that into the chain of title? Are you now placing thin...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Uh oh 2011 California case upholds fence!

Utah as well> Good discussion on agreement doctrines. It is a very clear and thorough clarification of the boundary location doctrines in Utah. I...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Uh oh 2011 California case upholds fence!

> I was thinking years after the fact when they just want recognize the reality, ugly as it is. That is if they wanted to avoid the litigation.>...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Uh oh 2011 California case upholds fence!

> But if you rely on past court rulings as basis for your action in boundary surveys then you are not doing your job. You are in effect becoming a ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Uh oh 2011 California case upholds fence!

Just where do you, as a surveyor, get the legal authority to declare that what the landowners have legally done in locating their one and only legal b...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Fences, Monuments, Boundaries: Ad Nauseum

> JB's philosophies and CA case law are somewhat divergent. For other locales, maybe not so much. Your mileage may vary.Huh????Not hardly. From my...

13 years ago
Page 48 / 79