AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
Brian Allen
Brian Allen
@brian-allen
Member
Joined: March 8, 2011 3:00 pm
Topics: 25 / Replies: 1545
Topic
Replies: 9
Views: 919
Reply
RE: implied Boundary Agreements-Deed of Trust

> > > > Bingo! That is true IF there is a conveyance. However, if the requirements of a boundary LOCATION doctrine have been met there I...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: implied Boundary Agreements-Deed of Trust

> Well, isn't the question what the duties of a mortgagor are and what the effect of a foreclosure is as far as contracts and conveyances entered i...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: implied Boundary Agreements-Deed of Trust

> Sure, of course he does. Otherwise, he spends a ton of money litigating the issue only to discover after a foreclosure that the judgment he got a...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: implied Boundary Agreements-Deed of Trust

> The trustee does. Arguably, by executing the deed of trust with a certain description of the land, the borrower is estopped from claiming that he...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

As you know, the problem is that many surveyors/title officers/GIS techs/assessors, etc., think there are two (or more) lines; the "record line", the ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

One last time.From Downing v. Boehringer, 349 P.2d 306 (1960):When such an agreement is executed and actual possession is taken under it, the parties ...

13 years ago
Topic
Replies: 2
Views: 289
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

I've read many from many different states, and I've never seen a court address the deed of trust. Gee, I wonder why??It is because apparently every c...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

> A boundary line agreement that is litigated results in a binding decision on all parties. One that we reduce to writing in order to avoid court ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

Leon,Did the changes in 10-9a-103 that were proposed a few years ago, actually pass? I can't find the section where the definition of "parcel boundar...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

> > The power and control over the boundary lines is SOLELY under the control of the landowners> > One item often overlooked in discussion...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

> You might argue that any actions affecting a land boundary involving two differing members of the public falls under the current definition of su...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

Please note that the rule saya "prima facia evidence". That is not the same as conclusive evidence. There is a difference.

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

:good: :good: :good: There is no one blinder than those that refuse to see.

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

LeonStill waiting on the district court decision.

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

LeonThe legislative problem you are having in Utah, I'm afraid is going to spread like statutory wildfire. IMHO, the "problem" has been created by su...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Subjective Uncertainty v. Objective Uncertainty

Dave,While I agree with much of what you have stated, there is one area that has not been considered. While the landowner has rights, such as be able...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: 4 rod roads - a taking?

It would depend on how the original road was acquired for public use, the subsequent area of use, and how the additional 1 rod is supposedly acquired....

13 years ago
Page 47 / 79