> Procedure protects rights> Accuracy protects position> Without both you have nothing.Really?
> The line was drawn at procedure, improper procedure dose not protect rights, private and public.Are state BLM offices allowed to make their own s...
> Quite the contrary. Members were invited, even begged for input for at least two years. I am not in that section of the state so I cannot say wha...
Privity of EstateI sounds like you have it under control. Here's another case that discusses quite a few issues that be important, including how subs...
> So a fence alone changes the boundary? I've yet to see any example of this, and have yet to hear anyone seriously advocate such a position.> M...
Amen brother. If you understand the requirements of the job, and know how to get there profitably - half the battle is won. If one is going to be sw...
> I want to go work for myself full time ASAP, and I think he fastest way to do it would be a solo operation. Most of my work is smaller boundaries...
> I have a question about using an RTK (base/rover) for setting control. I understand it's not the ideal way and I would MUCH rather traverse with ...
> I'm sure the non-CA people are having trouble wrapping their heads around the concept of buying two lots from a subdivision map but having only o...
> The California Appellate Courts have ruled that Subdivision Maps prior to 1929 did not create legal lots, there had to be a conveyance. How are ...
> Suppose you've got a closing section (Section 5) with found original off-line closing corners at the northwest and northeast corners. There is l...
> Legal Principles of Property Boundary Location on the Ground in the Public Land Survey States> By Ira M. Tillotson PE, PLS> 1973:good: A re...
Loyce was quite a person.She was the first contact I had with the ISPLS. It was the conference in Boise 1999. When you met Loyce, you didn't forget ...
> The most essential for me is a binder for each State I work in. It contains all statutes, rules and recent Board decisions. They are tabbed and k...
> I'm sure it is, but it really has no relevance to the OP's situation, though, which was how to describe a line that followed the average alignmen...
> I think it's more a matter of Idaho and Utah law specifying that all fences automatically become boundaries regardless of what the adjoining land...
> The OP states that these are new division lines so Mutual Recognition and Acquiesence doesn't apply. Please re-read Leon's post, you have entire...
Yepper, spot on Leon.If the grantor & grantee (landowners) want the fence to be the boundary, then it is the boundary; the fence is the physical m...
LOL!! :good: