Reading RPLS is free for the whole profession. Members post, reply, and get the members-only rooms.
Last seen: September 23, 2026 8:19 pm
I guess the slash on the end is required.?ÿ Most web sites don't care about that.
The article omits the very important difference between astronomical latitude, which was the only practical kind when many of those lines were laid ou...
If your software uses the antenna calibration data, then whether you mix or match you are better off orienting the antennas.?ÿ Granted, the horizontal...
It should EITHER have the negative longitude or say W or West.?ÿ Not both.
1) I took a quick look, but it maked my head hurt. 2) I had to look twice to see that the link wasn't posted by Fleming.?ÿ He's the one who usually qu...
I would argue that consistently having the antenna oriented the same way would produce more accurate coordinates, especially if the software knows how...
I have a 1958 plat that shows 0.9 ft between one set of back corners.?ÿ Sheesh.?ÿ The lot sizes weren't so critical they couldn't have used a single c...
What was Ned's survey plat??ÿ DIY (incompetent or fraudulent) or real and misinterpreted (intentionally or not)?
The town was laid out in the 1800's.?ÿ I haven't seen the paperwork for that, but doubt it followed current procedures for dedication and acceptance.?...
I agree with His Bovineness, knowing a bearing for a particular line is more useful than knowing how bearings were arrived at. Knowing that bearings w...
Ok, pick the appropriate category and ask a question. You'll get lots of answers from the opinionated folks here, and some of them may even be right. ...
I'd be surprised if the RR folks didn't accept anything within 0.1 or 0.2 in 200 as being "straight"
I didn't see that location in the list of stations in the article.
Link didn't work.?ÿ Try