I would hope this is the notes taken in the field, and not the description on the plat, where it would not be acceptable.?ÿ But it seems fully compreh...

Probably he was right but it could be taken either way.

The original surveyor measured TO the tree.?ÿ The retracing surveyor measures FROM the tree.

On page 17 he says he would measure from the blaze.?ÿ Was it not the practice to give distances from the center of the tree?

I'm not sure what you mean by classification. The GPS will give you XYZ coordinates or latitude/longitude and ellipsoidal height.?ÿ The geoid has no ...

Is your guy sure there isn't a rebar somewhere under the nail? Or if it WAS placed over a magnetic signal that the signal was from a real monument and...

I suppose this rock:

Not quite what you're asking, but I've seen the Mason and Dixon "star gazer's stone" which was set in 1764 as the azimuth mark for their observations ...

Probably??ÿ That means you are still on the hook for them if they find any other reason to look at your work?

I probably wasn't clear in my post made as a meeting was starting.?ÿ My GPS measurements between other points on his plat match very well but the chal...

If that situation arises, isn't it covered as a legal principle even without the statement?

It can be confusing if there isn't a clear record. Corner of family land.?ÿ I measure from ties and other irons on the plat of the surveyor who set t...

The few newer TV sets I've had occasion to use either have buttons on the side for those functions, or else touch-sensitive areas on the front labeled...

Sounds like they probably knew where the boundaries were until somebody did a brand new section breakdown, and now are trying to clean up the mess.

So it adds confusion, but shouldn't be a problem, as they can't actually grant what they didn't own. I could give you a quit claim for the same land a...

Was he playing dead?