AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
aliquot
aliquot
@aliquot
Free
Joined: September 14, 2011 5:19 pm
Last seen: September 6, 2025 2:18 pm
Topics: 16 / Replies: 2307
Reply
RE: New Definition of Navigable Waterway

Posted by: Duane Frymire "Stare decisis aside in the long haul of history, the Law of Nature will ultimately determine whether the Moose River is navi...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Thread of River

Posted by: Peter Ehlert default to me has been: In other words, the thread of the stream is the deepest groove or trench in the bed of a river channel...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Thread of River

Posted by: hillsidesurveyor Thank you for all of the replies. ?ÿ I have reviewed the sited cases and searched for other cases on google scholar. I was...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Thread of River

Posted by: Duane Frymire If the Islands are truly in the middle, then owners on each side of the river would seem to each own half according to this: ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Thread of River

I don't know anything about Iowa state law, but generally the thalweg is the boundary within navigable rivers, it is the center of the deepest or main...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Hawaii lava flow accetion... who owns it?

Posted by: Dave Karoly The Supreme Court is too busy developing the Law of Bakeries to deal in minor things like accretion. I would think a Lava Flow ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Adverse possess alley?

Posted by: Glenn Breysacher While all cases are unique, there has to be an acceptance by the municipality of the offer of dedication, which is evidenc...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: New Definition of Navigable Waterway

Posted by: Dave Karoly It seems like a big question the SC should get involved in. A) Did all of the States get their sovereign lands when they were a...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: New Definition of Navigable Waterway

It sounds like you are saying the same thing I am. It is premature for surveyors to apply this outside of the 4th circuit though.?ÿThis "new" law is c...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: New Definition of Navigable Waterway

Posted by: Duane Frymire The case changes the accepted definition of nav in law waters in NC, NY, and probably some other states.?ÿ How that may be us...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: New Definition of Navigable Waterway

Posted by: Duane Frymire Wow!?ÿ Things could get interesting in some of the original 13 colonies.?ÿ Like NC, NY highest court has interpreted the law ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Acres in SW of Section 7

Posted by: thebionicman I see the BLM do it both ways. In my opinion it is clearer to call them lots. At the same time if you pull the plat and notes ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Acres in SW of Section 7

?ÿ If the section wasn't lotted by the GLO than all the aliqout parts within the section were created when the plat was approved. So the SW1/4SW1/4 do...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: New Definition of Navigable Waterway

I think the only difference in Tennessee would be the date used to determine navigability would be 7 years latter. Although Tennessee was part of the ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: New Definition of Navigable Waterway

Oh, I dont doubt that it has important implications for?ÿ North Carolinians I was just pointing out that there was no new definition for navigability....

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Adverse possess alley?

Posted by: paden cash Literally hundreds of cases have reiterated that "non-use of dominant rights (as in a right-of-way) does not in itself constitut...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: New Definition of Navigable Waterway

Posted by: leegreen In New York state we have two definitions for Navigable waterways. The public maintains different sets of rights, depending on whe...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: New Definition of Navigable Waterway

There is no new definition of navigability in this case. This case is about the federal definition of navigability. Not the North Carolina definition....

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Adverse possession/ unwritten rights?

Posted by: Nate The Surveyor As i age, I more tend to see the idea behind "landmarks prevail over old, non-enforceable deeds". Charge well, show the p...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Would love to know why

Posted by: paden cash I worked on a survey a few years back that (prior to my work) had divided 40 acres (described as the SW/4, NW/4) into 4 tracts f...

8 years ago
Page 81 / 117