> I want an MS50! Now, if only I could find a way to keep it busy...
And that is the key, if you don't have the type of workflow that requires the applications....it's probably not worth it.
I haven't had a chance to try the MS50 yet. I have an S6 and a VX right now. Does the trick, but for deformation monitoring I haven't been too crazy about the magdrive.
Do the ceramic plates on the MS50 make much of a difference in practice? Having had good luck with servo-driven robotic systems before, I'd been putting most of the blame on the magdrive.
> I haven't had a chance to try the MS50 yet. I have an S6 and a VX right now. Does the trick, but for deformation monitoring I haven't been too crazy about the magdrive.
>
> Do the ceramic plates on the MS50 make much of a difference in practice? Having had good luck with servo-driven robotic systems before, I'd been putting most of the blame on the magdrive.
I have the MS50 and a TS30 with the ceramic drive and it is light years ahead of the TPS1200s in terms of smoothness and speed. But now that you mention deformation monitoring, I would definitely look into an MS50. That would be an excellent application for it and something that could help you recoup your investment.
They are no where near the same instrument.
what does "Very Floaty" mean?? Have you gotten bad results? I'm interested in that as I just demo'd an S6 yesterday.
Cool thanks.