Question about Colorado utility surveys

If so, it is news to me.

Rankin, SB 18-167 was just introduced: A BILL FOR AN ACT CONCERNING ENFORCEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.?ÿ

?ÿ

?ÿ

Thanks!

A couple of years ago I wrote portions of the design manual specs for a DOT (the survey, CAD, utilities & ROW chapters); required?ÿ CI/ASCE 38-02?ÿLevel B at the 70% design phase & Level A at 90%.?ÿ

The technology is readily available and increasingly affordable to get a really good idea what's actually down there and where it its; it's stupid not to do it.?ÿ?ÿ

James, if not too much trouble, please send those specs to me through my email. Please let me know your thoughts about this bill.?ÿ

?ÿ

Warren,

I saw that, but where's the section on 3D mapping??ÿ It appears to be an "upgrade" to the existing law on underground utility locates for excavation, etc. because the feds found Colorado's existing law to be deficient.?ÿ I see it grants a PE some input into the process.

Current law requires a person, before conducting an excavation, to contact a nonprofit notification association (comprised of all owners and operators of underground facilities) by dialing '811' to learn the location of underground facilities in the excavation project area. The owners and operators must then accurately mark the location of their facilities. Violations of the excavation damage prevention law are enforced exclusively through civil actions initiated by damaged parties to collect specified civil penalties and damages. In 2016, the United States department of transportation's pipeline and hazardous materials safety administration (PHMSA) conducted an adequacy evaluation of Colorado's enforcement of its excavation damage prevention law and determined that the enforcement is inadequate, which may eventually result in the withholding of federal funds from Colorado.

The bill creates the underground damage prevention safety commission (commission) as an independent agency within the department of labor and employment. The commission has rule-making and enforcement authority regarding the excavation damage prevention law and is required to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the notification association to facilitate implementation and administration of the law. The notification association is required to provide administrative support to the commission in performing its duties.

A review committee of the commission initially determines whether a violation of the law has occurred and, if appropriate, recommends remedial action, potentially including a fine. Fines range from $250 for a single minor violation within the previous 12 months to $75,000 for a fourth major violation within the previous 12 months. The full commission is bound by the review committee's determination of facts but determines the final agency action regarding alleged violations. Fines are credited to the damage prevention fund, which the commission will use to develop educational programming, including by making grants, that is designed to improve worker and public safety relating to excavation and underground facilities.

Current law allows only an excavator to submit a location request to the notification association. The bill authorizes a licensed professional engineer designing excavation to submit a location request. The engineer is required to ensure that the engineering plans meet certain standards established by the American Society of Civil Engineers for defining the accuracy of an underground facility location. The notification association will collect a fee for each location request, which is deposited in the safety commission fund and used to pay the commission's expenses.

Current law creates 2 tiers of membership in the notification association. Tier 2 members are limited members with limited benefits and include certain special districts, local governments, cable television providers, and small telecommunications providers; tier 1 members are full members with full benefits, and tier 1 consists of all other owners and operators. If, after receiving a location request, the notification association determines that a tier 1 member owns or operates the underground facilities, the notification association contacts the tier 1 member to arrange for the marking of the underground facilities. If a tier 2 member owns or operates the underground facilities, the excavator must contact the tier 2 member to arrange for the marking of the underground facilities. Effective January 1, 2021, all underground facility owners and operators are full members of the notification association with full benefits, and excavators will no longer need to contact the owners or operators to arrange for the marking.

All new underground facilities installed on or after January 1, 2020, must be electronically locatable when installed. Home rule local governments are not subject to the commission's enforcement authority, but the governing body of a home rule local government is required to either adopt a similar enforceable damage prevention safety program or waive its exemption and delegate its damage prevention enforcement authority to the commission.

Information regarding the location of underground facilities is exempt from the 'Colorado Open Records Act', pursuant to the existing exemption for specialized details of critical infrastructure.

?ÿ

https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/asce.cfm

https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/design/sue/suebrochure.cfm

?ÿ

I'll take a look when I get some free time this weekend; at first glance I like requiring certain projects to rely on SUE rather than one-call utility markings...that process was never intended to produce design quality information.?ÿ

Putting one-call utility markings on a plan that someone is going to design utilities from is like just putting the property lines in from GIS info and then basing setbacks from it.?ÿ?ÿ

?ÿ