I usually show only the structure.
Waterline can be a day to day location.
At first glance, without knowledge of the site conditions and topography, that has to be the ugliest pool I've ever seen, add a couple "kiddie" pools near the big end and It would look like phallic symbol. 😉
FL/GA PLS., post: 423855, member: 379 wrote: At first glance, without knowledge of the site conditions and topography, that has to be the ugliest pool I've ever seen, add a couple "kiddie" pools near the big end and It would look like phallic symbol. 😉
Where would you put the water slide?
Scott Ellis, post: 423877, member: 7154 wrote: Where would you put the water slide?
Given the current catastrophic pool design, probably on the roof. 😉
arctan(x), post: 423634, member: 6795 wrote: So I've drafted up a prelim sketch of the pool and edge of water. Ignore the colors all you color haters! The edge of water at the pool skimmer is what I'm concerned about. Should I show that the edge of water goes to the back of the skimmer assembly?
If so, the edge of water will be within 6 feet of the slab.Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
I am okay with color on your sketch, however I feel the Red, Orange, and Pink are to close to the same shade, I would just have the property line in a Bold Black line, and I always when possible like to label Easements on the property I am surveying and not the adjacent property. Just to eliminate anyone from saying I thought that was on my neighbors property and not mine. I also like to have my distance labels inside the arrows, but that is just a personal preference. I also hate having both inches and tenths on a survey, but sometimes it happens, and if you show something with a tenth to a builder he is going to build it in inches. I would fillet the 6' setback line or label the other 6' setback line along the property line, once again just to avoid any confusion.
Discussions like this make me really happen to live in the boondocks. "We don't need no stinkin' regulations."
I hate sites like this, probably expensive area, and people are cramming as much as they can into the tightest spots.
I'd show everything, with dimensions, etc., including the skimmer.
If the forms are where shown on the sketch, how do you know where the proposed edge of water is going to be? Is that the inside face of the forms? If so, then I'd skip the water label, and label it as "form".
I'm assuming that the easement is an issue. I'd call it out on the plan, let the client and the pool company know about it, and let it be their decision on what they're going to do or not do. If the city still accepts, it's not your problem, but it could all still blow up years from now if the utility tries to use their full 7.5'. If it's overhead, maybe not a problem. If it's underground, who knows.
Overhead today, underground later... unless specified otherwise
Holy Cow, post: 424000, member: 50 wrote: Discussions like this make me really happen to live in the boondocks."
[SARCASM]me too[/SARCASM]
When I saw this post it reminded me of a survey that I was on before I was licensed. I was working in the city for a good survey firm that lot surveys for closing and alta type surveys pre alta surveys. It was the late 80s. I was on the A crew. The company ran about 4 crews.
There was a survey where one of the other crews surveyed a lot where the backyard pool occupied about a foot or so into the rear utility easement. The closing was being blocked by the pool. One of the owners of the firm sent us out there to confirm the other crew's work independent of their field work. He gave us instructions to survey with care. We basically found the same result. Then he went out there with a helper and checked all the work so he had 3 independent checks. He was a good surveyor. He would venture to the field on a regular basis to keep 'hands on' and also to evaluate his employees.
I don't remember the outcome but the pool did caused a big problem.
I think that one should only show the form boards. Showing proposed location of water lines is a iiffy.to me
.
The city inspector wants to see the proposed edge of water and is shown as a 1' offset from the forms per the design. I have a note and dimensions on the final plat stating that as well.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
Easements and city allowing are two unique things. An allow from the City isn't cover consent. It basically expresses your arrangement meets the segments of code recorded. The proprietor is on the snare for some other infringement, including the terms of easements.
I've seen this multiple occasions. Proprietors expect the allow implies it must be OK. We cannot discover everything except for we better not be in the propensity for neglecting to instruct them on things like this. Demonstrating the easement is the correct activity. Getting the data to the proprietor is basic.
Discover incredible arrangements for Summer Waves Rectangular Metal Frame Above Ground Swimming Pool. Shop with certainty on Polygroup!
In all due respect, I would advise your client to seek legal advice rather than you educate him on the potential ramifications. Lawyers have a problem with non-lawyers practicing their craft. Go figure.?ÿ
Another thing to consider is if there are any utilities in said easement or if it is in effect at this time. Unless you are doing a complete title search (if that is the way you do it in your part of the country) there may be issues that might have mitigated, eliminated, reduced or amended the easement and its terms and conditions.?ÿ?ÿ
?ÿ
?ÿ
